Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I recently installed mandrake 10.1 official and have had nothing but trouble with my extenal drives. I have one pen drive and one lacie 20gb drive. It finds the pen drive just fine but the I constantly have to mount the Lacie and then it won't let me writing to it. I have done all I know to give my login permissions to write to everything. then, knoqueror stopped working.
I decided to login as root. everything works fine. my drives load up, i can write to them.
is being in root a big deal. seems like linux frowns on this. Is it really than different than begin logged in as administrator on a win box?
only weirdness in root, no right click menu on desktop and the backspace on my keyboard doesn't backspace when I hold it down. I have to press the backspace button for every deletion i want to make.
Originally posted by tyrantworm
is being in root a big deal. seems like linux frowns on this. Is it really than different than begin logged in as administrator on a win box?
Actually it's equally stupid in both situations, just
Windows users don't mind as much ;}
You don't really want noatime in the first place, because
that will stop recording file-access times. It's something
that you'd want on a heavily loaded database server (because
it will somewhat accelerate disk writes) or if you're a
gentoo user (because performance is everything).
FAT doesn't have any permissions schemes, so when Linux mounts that type of filesystem it has to emulate permissions. Options given in /etc/fstab or to mount on the command-line determine who owns the files and what rights they have. You not being able to write to the device as a normal user can probably be fixed by messing with those settings.
If you mount it manually and the user option is specified in /etc/fstab you should own the files, what does 'ls -ld /mnt/msd' look like after you've mounted it?
Originally posted by tyrantworm what do you mean by filesystem? it's fat32. not sure if that is what you are looking for.
You might possibly have to mount the disk with the gid and uid options or with some default permissions because FAT drives don't support file ownerships and permissions in the same way as the unix-type filesystems.
o answer your original question, no, for you it is not a big deal. for others that maybe have multiple user accounts or have security concerns then yes it is a big deal.
All of your problems are permission based; root just has permission to do everything so all you have to work out is what you need to do as a user and add that in...
Originally posted by Tinkster You don't really want noatime in the first place, because
that will stop recording file-access times. It's something
that you'd want on a heavily loaded database server (because
it will somewhat accelerate disk writes) or if you're a
gentoo user (because performance is everything).
Cheers,
Tink
Ignoring the gentoo comment: noatime is also desirable on flash media, because they have a limited lifetime of # of writes. All my compact flash and USB drives (except my enclosure-d disk drive) get mounted noatime: not for performance, but for the sake of not burning them up. If you use a GUI on flash media, every browsing of the directory is seen as a read on ALL files.
add the noauto option, which will stop it from automounting. I had the same problem when mine mounted at boot time. if the user mounted it manually then all was fine.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.