Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just use top to check the system status and have one process is using rather high resource , this process is created by development team , one thing I am wondering is that the time it have run is "13031:20" .
I don't know what the job is actually processing as I am not come from development team , I seldom found any process are running over "1000:00" in my system .
In general speaking , the process running in such long time , is that a alnormal process ( in usually ) , we should control the system not to allow such kind of process is running ?
It could be anything as others suggested, it could be also a bug on the software or program they are developing (memory leak) or just plain lazy programmers that does not consider hardware resources when creating programs. (no optimization)
It could be anything as others suggested, it could be also a bug on the software or program they are developing (memory leak) or just plain lazy programmers that does not consider hardware resources when creating programs. (no optimization)
so you mean a process should not have "10000:00" CPU time using ? I have another monitoring tools also have such high CPU time , is it also should not have such high CPU time ?
You have asked if this is bad versus not. We, your fellow LQ members, can't give you an absolute answer.
How I'd approach this is to take as much data as possible and determine if this process "is", or "can be" disruptive to the system. And then discuss this with the development team, or the correct persons in your organization.
The top report indicates that it is using 52.1% of the CPU, 3.9% of memory, and the PID is a very high number.
You have given the impression that this is a program which is under development and that there is a development team with which you can speak to about these observations. Suggest you do exactly that, speak to your development team about these observations.
Indicators like this can mean "something", "nothing", or they can mean "possible". Perhaps this is a known detail about this code. Perhaps this is already deemed to be a code defect which they are working on, or they have in their queue. Perhaps the state of their code is that it is preliminary and not yet functionally complete.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.