[SOLVED] Intrinsic function PRECISION in GFortran - how it works?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Intrinsic function PRECISION in GFortran - how it works?
Hi there. My environment: Win7==>Oracle VB==>Ubuntu==>GFortran. I need to check if my computations which involve long recurrences lose precision. There is an intrinsic function PRECISION (X) in Fortran. My question is: Let's say I defined a function f(x). Inside of this function there is a variable res which is a part of a do loop and the loop takes let's say 50 recurrences thus changing the variable res 50 times. Every time it is a bunch of additions and multiplications. Can I apply the PRECISION (res) function after that to determine if I've lost any significant digits?
No. That function would tell you what the precision of the current variable is (somewhere around 7 significant digits if single precision, 15 if double), but it wouldn't be able to tell you if some mathematical operation you've performed in the past was truncated due to lack of precision.
The best option is to run through the math yourself, either that or re-run the same process with a double or a quad to see if there is any significant difference.
suicidaleggroll, thanks again. I sort of did some research last night and came to the same conclusion. I do have a question, however, while I have you here :-) Will this declaration REAL (KIND=16) :: x guarantee the quadruple precision for the variable x? Thanks A.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.