Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Arch linux is another alternative for low powered systems. I use Arch linux with Openbox. Takes up about 120M of ram, 2G HDD space,.. running on an old Compaq laptop with a Celeron/1G ram from 2000 era.
I agree that Mint might be a bit much for that laptop. AntiX, MX, or Salix would be fine: I was using my Pentium III laptop with Salix only the other day.
Since the OP is a Linux beginner, I would definitely NOT recommend Arch. I've tried installing that twice, and succeeded once — and that took several hours.
PS It's just been reported that Arch is dropping 32-bit support.
Last edited by DavidMcCann; 01-30-2017 at 10:40 AM.
Reason: New information
Location: Montreal, Quebec and Dartmouth, Nova Scotia CANADA
Distribution: Arch, AntiX, ArtiX
Posts: 1,363
Rep:
Hey Craig - I played around alot with Linux on old hardware - another vote from me to stay away from Ubuntu, Mint or anything big and bloated.
I've had success with various flavours of Puppy in the past (the 2.14X "Classic Pup" line is particularly forgiving of old hardware ...) ;
... and Arch. With Arch, you may have to use an older ISO and be careful not to update your system indiscriminately - Arch as a rolling release will bring you right up to date with today's versions of all your packages, kernel and all ... David McCann's above comment concerning Arch is valid, however: it's not the type of distro that is easy on beginners - you must spend a lot of time reading up on things and you end up with a command line installation to build upon. Those are the reasons it is my preferred distro, although I admit it was not my first. I went through Ubuntu and Puppy before settling down with Arch ... ;-)
Although I have no experience with it myself, many others here recommend antiX for old hardware.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.