Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Of course, you will have to have a current support aggreement to do it....
That's both correct and incorrect.
The download location is correct; however, you do NOT have to pay for RHEL to download it or use it...you register/log in to their website for free, and download away. What you DO have to pay for is patches/bugfixes/security updates/support. And if you're going to build a server with RHEL, and NOT pay for it, that's a VERY BAD IDEA. Your server will be insecure and unstable VERY quickly, and loading new software will be MUCH more difficult. If you want RHEL for free, load CentOS.
And OP, why are you loading RHEL to start with, and why aren't you loading the latest version, which is 6.5??? And please, OP...try to look things like this up, rather than asking people to look them up for you.
Chuckling...I unfortunatly have the experience TBOne has eluded to. With Redhat everything past go (the os dl)costs you plenty. I tried but never could get a stable system functioning. I second the notion of using CentOS.
Looks like they've tightened up their policy; you've got (in that img) RHEL7 (next beta) or RHEL3 (no longer supported) or RH9 (also no longer supported).
Maybe you have to supply some sort of credentials eg a contact email/phone to get a trial of current release.
Looks like they've tightened up their policy; you've got (in that img) RHEL7 (next beta) or RHEL3 (no longer supported) or RH9 (also no longer supported). Maybe you have to supply some sort of credentials eg a contact email/phone to get a trial of current release.
If you sign up with a 'personal' account, you won't see it. If you sign up with a corporate account, you can. Both are free, but the corporate one is the type that will get you the 30 day evaluation period w/downloads of different versions.
But I agree totally...if you're going to use RHEL, you need to pay for it. Otherwise, use CentOS....putting a server in place at a company that you KNOW had no support/updates/patches/fixes, and that installing new software on will be MUCH harder, is a recipe for headaches later. CentOS gets free updates...RHEL doesn't.
I second the recommendation to either buy support from RedHat or use a free clone if you can't.
Besides the already mentioned CentOS, you have also Scientific Linux
and Springdale.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.