Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
since, the new glibc needed a newer version of glibc-common, and the newer version of glibc-common was
held to the older version of glibc I was in a cycle. I just forced them since they were the only dependencies of each other. Everything seems to work. fine..
You probably didn't need to --force the upgrade (and doingso with a package as critical as glibc can be very dangerous). You should just need to specify both packages as arguments and RPM will figure out that you're resolving all dependencies.
upgrading glibc is a huge issue
you will now have to rebuild just about everything on you system after you figure out what user space kernel headers to use or you will have *this program has performed an illegal operation syndrom*
like you were back at Redmon
the fact that you could do this with rpms is one of the reasons rpm sucks so badly
upgrading glibc is a huge issue
you will now have to rebuild just about everything on you system after you figure out what user space kernel headers to use or you will have *this program has performed an illegal operation syndrom*
Not true. Different 2.3.* versions of glibc are binary compatible, upgrading shouldn't cause any problems. The same is true for most other libraries as well, as long as the first two parts of the version number are same, no problem. Bigger updates (like glibc 2.2 to 2.3) are another story.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.