Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Using Mandriva 2006 and KDE 3.4, I copy to and from a 1.44mb floppy by opening Konqueror and navigating to the /mnt/floppy and then by cut and paste or drag and drop, I move the file(s) to/from the floppy.
Is this the correct way ? The file(s) get moved but I get the intermitant message of "stalled" at every 64KB of data exchange in the transfer window. Is there a buffer setting that I need to change ? Am I doing this correctly ?
Thanks in advance,
Scott Nash
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
But in this day & age, I don't understand why people still insist on mounting floppies.
Programs like Mtools and other automatic mounting tools are a good idea, however they are not failsafe. If there are problems, then manually mounting and unmounting can show up errors that the automatic tools don't.
Also, I dont understand why people use floppy disks theese days (but I am sure that Cara25 has a good reason). USB flash drives, DVDs and network transfers are a much better idea where available or possible.
Programs like Mtools and other automatic mounting tools are a good idea, however they are not failsafe.
Errr... MTools does not provide "automatic mounting."
According to their website:
"Mtools is a collection of utilities to access MS-DOS disks from Unix without mounting them." (emphasis added)
The method used is actually far safer than mounting, because writes to the disk are instantaneous and not cached. As long as the light is off, it is safe to eject the disk.
Try it and see.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBall
Also, I dont understand why people use floppy disks theese days ... USB flash drives ... are a much better idea where available or possible.
Funny you mention that. Guess what software I use to access USB flash drives? Hint: Every USB flash drive I've ever seen has a FAT filesystem...
Sure, it isn't as flexible or dynamic as some systems, but is far simpler and much less cumbersome. And it beats the hell out of manually mounting them or adding lines to /etc/fstab.
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
Errr... MTools does not provide "automatic mounting."
According to their website: "Mtools is a collection of utilities to access MS-DOS disks from Unix without mounting them." (emphasis added)
The method used is actually far safer than mounting, because writes to the disk are instantaneous and not cached. As long as the light is off, it is safe to eject the disk.
Looks interesting. I assumed that it was just another automouting tool, but I was wrong. I guess it must access the disk using its device name, and mapping it to an alias or something. It certainly is a good idea to have instantaneous writes to Floppy disks (and USB drives), because premature ejecting is very common.
Quote:
Funny you mention that. Guess what software I use to access USB flash drives? Hint: Every USB flash drive I've ever seen has a FAT filesystem...
Sure, it isn't as flexible or dynamic as some systems, but is far simpler and much less cumbersome. And it beats the hell out of manually mounting them or adding lines to /etc/fstab.
I guess it must access the disk using its device name, and mapping it to an alias or something.
Yes. The aliases are configurable to DOS style drive letters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBall
because premature ejecting is very common.
Second only to premature joculation (laughing before the joke is finished....)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBall
Doesn't Udev normally deal with USB sticks?
Udev only provides the /dev entry.
Most distros use HAL (in combination with udev) for removable media these days. Slackware doesn't provide HAL. So for me, it is just as easy to use MTools to access USB sticks.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.