[SOLVED] Arch linux net install: is a firewall necessary?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I did a net install of Arch via a net install flashdrive. Should I have been behind a firewall during the installation process? If should have been a firewall, then the help guides are grievously negligent in perhaps litigable sense of the term for not stating this fact.
In general, it rarely ever hurts using a NAT router unless you want to do pxe-boot(which
you should only do on a trusted network, anyway).
But, unlike a windows install, there are not vulnerable services open to the internet
until you configure some.
This linuxquestions court does hereby find the defendants, Arch linux wiki contributors, not guilty of grievous help guide negligence. Court is adjourned.
In general, it rarely ever hurts using a NAT router unless you want to do pxe-boot(which
you should only do on a trusted network, anyway).
But, unlike a windows install, there are not vulnerable services open to the internet
until you configure some.
Thanks for the Detail. I did the base install, then I installd the x-server. I only began to use sudo just before the desktop install. Would it be accurate to say that my actions did not constitute some sort of security breech?
If possible, I prefer a yes or no answer. This is open to Shylock too.
Only you know your actions good enough - a standard install followed by security updates, with download from only trusted repos with hash-checks, without opening unconfigured services, or services with "default passwords", does not introduce breeches.
Only you know your actions good enough - a standard install followed by security updates, with download from only trusted repos with hash-checks, without opening unconfigured services, or services with "default passwords", does not introduce breeches.
Cool! all I did was follow instructions for the standard install of the base system, x-server & desktop. During my web install of Arch, which was not done behind a firewall, my web usage was confined to the pacman repos, so I am concluding that all is well, unless someone chimes in with some profound warning.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
