[SOLVED] Patching kernel source, cannot find in make menuconfig (unionfs)
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
[SOLVED] Patching kernel source, cannot find in make menuconfig (unionfs)
Hi
I need UnionFS support in my kernel. So I downloaded the .diff patch from the website (aligned for the same kernel number) and did
Code:
patch -p1 << xyz.diff
The whole process seemed to work, with no error messages displayed, and new code for unionfs in the /usr/src/linux/fs directory.
However, when I run make menuconfig, I do not see the new unionfs option. So I tried make oldconfig but it did not prompt for any new options... am I missing a step here?
Any help appreciated,
Thanks
Last edited by coffeecoffee; 12-20-2009 at 06:58 AM.
Reason: solved
Hi, It's possible your kernel already has the configuration applied, but maybe not selected.
Yes, I agree, make oldconfig should have offered the corrections, but if they are in there already, then you may need to carefully, go through the config.
Keep trying, there may be a package that needs updating, as well.
Regards Glenn
Last edited by GlennsPref; 12-15-2009 at 03:45 AM.
Reason: spelling
Hi, It's possible your kernel already has the configuration applied, but maybe not selected.
Yes, I agree, make oldconfig should have offered the corrections, but if they are in there already, then you may need to carefully, go through the config.
Keep trying, there may be a package that needs updating, as well.
Regards Glenn
Thanks for the reply. The kernel I am using is a vanilla kernel, and unionFS definitely isn't part of the standard kernel yet. I did a search through the .config file but the CONFIG_UNION_FS is not found in there.. I think I am doing something wrong. Perhaps its because my kernel has r6 after the kernel version, maybe it is incompatible?
It is vanilla, about 50Mb's and will contain the unionfs, (I've seen it mentioned in 2.6.3xxx)
But you're probably better to wait till your repo comes up with a version that fits.
The problem with most distros now, is they don't keep track of source installs.
That can cause problems later.
Regards Glenn
Thanks, however unfortunately unionfs is not included with any standard Linux kernel yet, even the latest. The only way to use unionfs is to patch your existing kernel, or download an already patched one. :/
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.