Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
10-27-2013, 12:36 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: ArchLinux - 3.0 kernel
Posts: 349
Rep:
|
setting gc_stale_time does not decrease ARP requests
in trying to reduce the frequency of ARPs sent from my router to modem, I would think setting gc_stale_time on the interface to a higher number would do it - 600 in this case for 10 mins. But I still have ARPs sent a few times every minute:
Code:
11:24:12.509865 ARP, Request who-has y.y.y.y tell x.x.x.x, length 28
11:24:12.510246 ARP, Reply y.y.y.y is-at b8:9b:c9:d9:a8:4a, length 46
11:24:54.456558 ARP, Request who-has y.y.y.y tell x.x.x.x, length 28
11:24:54.456919 ARP, Reply y.y.y.y is-at b8:9b:c9:d9:a8:4a, length 46
11:25:35.563199 ARP, Request who-has y.y.y.y tell x.x.x.x, length 28
11:25:35.563559 ARP, Reply y.y.y.y is-at b8:9b:c9:d9:a8:4a, length 46
11:26:15.229867 ARP, Request who-has y.y.y.y tell x.x.x.x, length 28
11:26:15.230238 ARP, Reply y.y.y.y is-at b8:9b:c9:d9:a8:4a, length 46
11:26:55.096522 ARP, Request who-has y.y.y.y tell x.x.x.x, length 28
11:26:55.096885 ARP, Reply y.y.y.y is-at b8:9b:c9:d9:a8:4a, length 46
is there some other reason for these requests to be sent?
|
|
|
10-29-2013, 03:23 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,893
Rep:
|
It is complex to control ARP request interval. You can try change gc_stale_time and gc_interval under neigh and route directory.
|
|
|
10-30-2013, 01:47 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891
Rep:
|
Whats the point? Is it causing a problem?
|
|
|
10-30-2013, 10:22 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: ArchLinux - 3.0 kernel
Posts: 349
Original Poster
Rep:
|
just trying to minimize unnecessary network traffic.
it actually did work after some time, although the cable modem it was connected to eventually lost access, after which changing it back to the default resumed normal operation. it's not a big deal.
|
|
|
11-03-2013, 12:46 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891
Rep:
|
I've not seen an issue with normal ARP operation since we left the era of huge flat bridged networks behind (and good riddance!).
My rule of thumb, painfully learned over 25 years is, if it ain't broke don't fix it :-)
I KNOW, I think its Heinlein who talked about how people only ever learn the hard way......thats me...
|
|
|
11-03-2013, 12:52 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: ArchLinux - 3.0 kernel
Posts: 349
Original Poster
Rep:
|
me as well but thats the best way to learn.
actually somewhat interestingly, one time i set up a packet counter at my parents house (residential cable modem) on the linux router there, filtering for ARP packets, and left it running for ~2 weeks. the amount of data used by ARP traffic alone was >11GB! literally 50-100 arps a second.
|
|
|
11-04-2013, 04:21 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891
Rep:
|
Ouch, that's NOT normal!
|
|
|
11-04-2013, 06:59 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: ArchLinux - 3.0 kernel
Posts: 349
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yeah, nearly all of them are "tell x.x.x.1", i'm assuming coming from comcast's routers. to top it all off, that 11GB most definitely counts towards the bandwidth cap, even though it's completely un-initiated from the user.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|