Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
yeah, this is really not the right forum at all, i.e. not a Cisco forum but a Linux one... however...
We actually just got caught out by this the other day. 10 users is 10 internal arp entries. we had 12 clients in a site, some of whom had not previously used the network much. when they started to, at any given time 2 machines could not leave the site, as the arp table wouldn't add the new entries at all. ouch. upgraded to the 50 user license, and all is sweet.
Hi! Since you have replied to my thread I might as well clarify things out.. If I have say 20 machines behind a router, and the router is connected to the PIX. Will PIX know that there are multiple machines behind it or it will just recognize only the router? Thanks..
i'd like to say that as it's on a different subnet that no, it's not going to affect it, but i really don't know. there's only one MAC address in the equation, but maybe there are other devious tricks i'm not aware of. I do know that somethign as scraweny as a 501 isn't meant to be infront of multiple routed LAN's though.
oh hang on.. just checked google. says it's the number of ip addresses on the inside interface, not mac's, so unless you're actually proxying traffic, or source natting it on the router, they would also fail past 10 (including the router itself, so you could only have 9 ip's behind the router... )
Last edited by acid_kewpie; 08-17-2007 at 03:59 AM.
i'd like to say that as it's on a different subnet that no, it's not going to affect it, but i really don't know. there's only one MAC address in the equation, but maybe there are other devious tricks i'm not aware of. I do know that somethign as scraweny as a 501 isn't meant to be infront of multiple routed LAN's though.
oh hang on.. just checked google. says it's the number of ip addresses on the inside interface, not mac's, so unless you're actually proxying traffic, or source natting it on the router, they would also fail past 10 (including the router itself, so you could only have 9 ip's behind the router... )
so u mean if i am source natting, the pix would only recognize 1 ip(the ip of the router) no matter how many machines are behind it. i would really like to clarify this thing bcoz if that's the case it would ease my work and be saved from upgrading the licenses.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.