LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-23-2005, 12:53 PM   #1
funkymunky
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Distribution: Fedora Core 8, 32-bit
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 15
Lightbulb Is NFS the solution to my problem?


Hi everyone,

I am a senior undergrad student, we have an ethernet consisting of around 30 PCs, most running windoze, and some running Linux (Fedora Core 3). We are plagued by the problem of some users sharing explicit content on their PCs. To overcome this, we have to come up with a solution. (or, the authorities have asked us to do this, or pack up the LAN)

The major problem is that the network is peer to peer..all the PCs are connected to each other with hubs and dumb(non-programmable) switches, there is no central control.

To overcome this, we are thinking about NFS. We imagine that it would help if NFS was implemented so that there would be one virtual drive shared accross the whole LAN, so that everyone would have to add the data he wanted to share to this drive, and this could be monitored centrally on one of the PCs running Linux.

1. First of all..is doing this feasable? Is it a good idea?

2. If its possible..how do we interface NFS with the windoze machines (if im not mistaken, windoze has something analogous called VFS ?)

3. Any better ideas?


By the way, we want to manage the LAN somehow through the Linux PCs..We are fed up of windoze with its locked doors and costly add-ons.
We can dedicate a PC solely to this purpose.
We cannot change the network topology.

Thanx in anticipation..

Mayank

 
Old 03-23-2005, 02:15 PM   #2
keefaz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 6,552

Rep: Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872
Quote:
We cannot change the network topology
If you enable sharing, there is not true way to filter share content, the more restrictive you
will be, the more imaginative will be the users to bypass you rules...
 
Old 03-23-2005, 11:25 PM   #3
funkymunky
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Distribution: Fedora Core 8, 32-bit
Posts: 126

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thats not an option..we HAVE to enable sharing..and we HAVE to monitor it..i see the possibility of users getting smart as an opportunity to learn more, not as a threat. Itl be a good workout for everyone.
 
Old 03-24-2005, 07:12 AM   #4
keefaz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 6,552

Rep: Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872
Could you explain your problem more simpler ?

As I understand you :
- Users do actually share porn content
- You want to avoid that

I can't find out of my mind an automatic way to know what sort of content users are sharing, you have to do it by hand.
In the case of NFS share, you have to mount all exported FS to browse the shared content.
In the case of FTP server, shares are centralized in only one server, users upload the files to a machine to share it.
 
Old 03-24-2005, 11:49 AM   #5
funkymunky
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Distribution: Fedora Core 8, 32-bit
Posts: 126

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
that is correct...uv got it bang on

there seems to be no automatic way to control who shares what. the aim is to have centrally manageable storage space..so that when detected, such content could be deleted by the admin..the admin would, of course, have to check the content periodically..

the ftp server has a drawback that we just have a 40 gig hdd in the comp that wud act as the server.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFS client = Linux, NFS server = Mac OS X Tiger --> Hell of a problem make Linux - Networking 9 03-10-2006 05:16 AM
solution help 'Skipped services in runlevel 5: nfs splash smbfs ' nickaelwen Linux - Newbie 1 11-01-2005 09:54 AM
nfs client on knoppix 3.9 - problem mounting nfs drive Rod Butcher Linux - Networking 1 09-21-2005 04:18 AM
This could be the solution for my problem but... SGFHK321 Linux - Newbie 1 07-13-2004 11:49 AM
solution to a UT problem I had recently gonus LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 1 07-27-2003 04:09 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration