LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2004, 11:05 PM   #1
glenn69
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Chicagoland
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 261

Rep: Reputation: 32
Question Is Linux right for small office network?


I have very little networking experience, have run a home network under Windows 98 though. I am interested in converting my office of 4 computers to a Linux network with all Linux machines.

My questions:

1) Currently we have no dedicated SERVER, peer to peer I think they call it. We use a database regularly. Should our new network have a server? (and what exactly is the purpose of a server machine vs peer to peer?)

2) On a site that I visited this was the suggestion made on OS to use in network. Is this true or simply the view of a "Windows Person?" This is from http://www.pcmech.com/byos/step/3/

Quote:
Linux

Although I am just as much of a Linux “freedom fighter” as any other guy, I would have to discourage the average guy from trying to run a Linux server. Although Linux is secure, Linux is also near impossible to configure for server usage. The sheer number of programs that have independent management interfaces and configuration text files that oftentimes conflict each other will confuse the budding server administrator and will most likely eat up quite a bit of his time. Second, Linux has many design quirks and flaws that are cumbersome at worse, but certainly will make a newbie intimidated. And, of course, why fix something that isn't broken, right? If Windows 2000 fits your needs, then by all means, use Windows 2000.
 
Old 07-29-2004, 11:59 PM   #2
jschiwal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682
Does Mr. Shin discuss the royalty payments you would be making also. Perhaps a better question is if linux has the programs you need to run your business. The Open Office or Star Office suites are excellent. If you are accustomed to using outlook, you may be comfortable with Novell's Evolution which is free as is Open Office.

I don't believe setting up an email server or database is any easier in windows than linux. The distributions have wizards to help you install them. If you purchase an Enterprise Edition distribution from Red Had, SuSE or Mandrake, they have extra tools to help you. You could purchase a service contract at a much more reasonable rate also. Compare making changes to a text setup file in Linux, with using the registry editor in windows to find an item which isn't accessible from a Wizard. Also, with time the registry tends to get bloated which hurts the performance of other programs. If a single program setup file mucks up the registry, then you could be in big trouble. The individual sections of a registry can be as dispersed as the setup files in linux that the author refers to.

One use of a server would be a central location for each users home files. This would make backups more convenient. Also, if you install a server with SCSI raid-5 drives, failure would be less likely. You could also operate an office e-mail server. If you need a database, it needs to be located in a central location.

Another use for a server is for security. Protecting the computers and network from unauthorized access. Just hit escape when a windows 98 log-in screen comes up. The computer resources are not protected at all.

If you could share the /bin, /sbin, /usr and /lib directory hierarchies, you can install or upgrade software in the server once instead of doing this at each computer. There is a Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard publication on the web which explains this.

You would have less of a problem with viruses and spy ware. I installed an anti-spyware program on my bosses Windows 2000 computer. There were around 60 programs and almost 6000 traces that it got rid of. Some of these spyware programs not only track iexplorer, but also email and private messages.

There are also books you could resort to to help you set up a linux network. Samba could also be used in a Linux only network. The team that wrote Samba put out an official book that is excellent. You may find that a certain windows accounting program is indispensable for you. In that case you could have a mixed network with Linux, windows and mac computers using samba.

This message turned out to be a lot longer than I was expecting it to be. Authors tend to be opinionated. Even Linux authors.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
small network windows to linux warpedlinuxmind Linux - Networking 1 07-31-2005 11:58 PM
New small office network help needed tazagul Linux - Networking 2 06-05-2005 09:35 AM
small office solution - need help hellblade Linux - Enterprise 2 11-23-2004 05:31 AM
Linux Firewall or Appliances for more then small office saintbyrd Linux - Security 4 01-26-2004 11:09 AM
networking small office Galorin Linux - Networking 9 05-08-2003 05:04 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration