Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
All i'm trying to find out and so far haven't obviously even though i've looked at the linux-HA website is if:
The HA linux heartbeat clustering stuff, how does it fail over. IE When a problem is detected does one server turn off and another server in the cluster take over the operation of running the services the master was running. If fact perhaps i'm a little off and that the systems ing the HA cluster aren't clones of each other, i would have thought they need to be. As you can tell i'm a little confused here.
well ha is a daemon that manages ip availability. the only job is to ensure that certain ip addresses are available to a network. the actual sdervices being run on the boxes are irrelevant. ther's certainly no need to maintain mirror images of servers, for example you might have a main box for www, ftp, smtp etc... and run a single backup for all functions in one box due to budget or something. here you'd have 3 ha instances preferring each using an active passive box with the dedicated boxes being the primary in each pair, and the single backup being the secondary. if any box fails, the backup box takes over the ip address of that box and so you stay in business. how the apps on the boxes work and syncrhonize data etc, is your problem, not linux-ha's.
Last edited by acid_kewpie; 04-23-2007 at 03:48 PM.
and run a single backup for all functions in one box due to budget or something. here you'd have 3 ha instances preferring each using an active passive box with the dedicated boxes being the primary in each pair
Sorry i just dont understand what you're meaning is on this part?
one other thing, heartbeat as you say doesn't do any syncing, unlesss set-up of course i know it can be used with several different packages like DRDB etc, but doesn't that make heartbeat like the Fake package then?
well these kinds of tools have subtle differences and i'm not directly that familiar with linux-ha in it's own rite, but all any daemon like this is for is load balancing or failing over at the netwrok level.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.