eth0 closed. Is this bad?

		LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
eth0 closed. Is this bad?

Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.

Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.

Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.

Search this Thread

09-28-2003, 11:51 AM	#1
ToTLaugher LQ Newbie Registered: Sep 2003 Location: Massachusetts Distribution: RedHat 9 Posts: 6 Rep:	eth0 closed. Is this bad? I have a belkin f5d6050 usb wireless. When I run dmesg, the last line is: vnetusba.c: Device eth0 closed Previously in the output, it told me it was installed and registered. I'm guessing that the device closing is not a good thing. If it isn't the problem, then something else isn't working. But I'm guessing that having the device close is my problem. Does anyone know how I can figure out why its closing?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc3	Lordandmaker	Linux - Hardware	15	06-05-2011 08:55 AM
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/cdrom,	Adil_uk	Linux - Hardware	9	02-16-2005 05:50 PM
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1	pmoreira	Linux - Hardware	5	02-26-2004 10:31 AM
wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb1,	ldare	Linux - Hardware	1	02-12-2004 09:03 PM
All PCs behind router with one eth0 each. Shorewall ACCEPTetho:192.168.1.0/24 - bad ?	cmisip	Linux - Security	4	09-20-2003 02:13 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Main Menu

(Con't)

My LQ

Write for LQ

LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.

Main Menu

Syndicate

Latest Threads

LQ News

Twitter: @linuxquestions