LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-01-2009, 10:57 PM   #1
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Rep: Reputation: 30
Question Bandwidth as a Link Metric (routing point of view)


Hello friends.
In the following paragraph Bandwidth is discussed as a link metric for routing protocols, but I little understand it. Please get me explain this.
Regards.

Quote:
Bandwidth is not additive, it is good when high, bad when low; thus in order to treat it as additive, it must be properly mapped. Consider, for example, a preference for a route that maximizes the minimum bandwidth link on the route, and then prefers a route with the fewest links of each bandwidth from the lowest. If links may be of three discrete bandwidths, "high", "medium" and low", this preference can be achieved, on the assumption that no route will have more than 10 links, with metric values of 1, 10 and 100 for the three bandwidths. If routes can have more than 10 links, the range of metrics must be increased; this indicates a preference for a wide "dynamic range" of link metric values.
 
Old 07-02-2009, 04:26 PM   #2
stress_junkie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 and CentOS 5.5
Posts: 3,873

Rep: Reputation: 332Reputation: 332Reputation: 332Reputation: 332
Nobody has responded yet so I'll offer an opinion.

I believe that anyone would find that paragraph difficult to understand. It seems to me that the author has used writing techniques designed to confuse the reader and obfuscate the meaning of the text. Techniques such as juxtaposing words that mean the opposite of each other, as in the expression "...maximizes the minimum..." and using other similar writing elements eventually overwhelms the reader with too much mental work to effectively understand the meaning of the text.

It seems that the person who wrote this is either a very poor writer or is intentionally trying to "baffle the readers with bullshit" as is often done by people in professional positions when they don't know what they are talking about. I'd say that whoever wrote that paragraph is attempting sound very knowledgeable and impress people who do not understand the subject. The concepts that are being presented in such a torturous manner are, in fact, very simple. The writer is simply talking about configuring a network route to achieve the greatest performance at the least cost of resources. However when you read the paragraph you come away confused and convinced that the subject matter must be very advanced and complex. It is neither. I suggest that the writer was very confused and unable to express themselves clearly.

Or, I could be wrong.

Last edited by stress_junkie; 07-02-2009 at 04:28 PM.
 
Old 07-03-2009, 10:11 AM   #3
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thank you stress_junkie for taking interest. You may be right. Let us wait some more time for someone's help and guidance..
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:34 AM   #4
CmdoColin
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 31

Rep: Reputation: 17
Metric is a cost used to select a route, traffic will be passed down the lowest cost route.

So I'd config:

route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.0.0.1 metric 1
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.0.0.2 metric 10

When gateway 10.0.0.1 is available, it will use that, when it isn't it will use the higher cost metric of 10, and get passed to the 10.0.0.2.

Re-read that paragraph and it makes sense then.
 
Old 07-28-2009, 01:21 PM   #5
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks. You really cleared the point.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fedora Core 5 from Slackers' point of view. jaakkop Linux - Distributions 8 08-06-2006 12:58 PM
What is WAN point-to-point link? ivj Linux - Networking 1 07-16-2005 01:20 AM
MS-Linux.....an eWeek point of view... Whitehat General 9 12-12-2003 06:43 PM
Routing and bandwidth limiting someone2 Linux - Networking 3 04-28-2003 09:19 PM
Power Point view in Linux ? mikeshn Linux - Software 2 12-09-2002 10:56 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration