Bandwidth as a Link Metric (routing point of view)
Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Bandwidth as a Link Metric (routing point of view)
Hello friends.
In the following paragraph Bandwidth is discussed as a link metric for routing protocols, but I little understand it. Please get me explain this.
Regards.
Quote:
Bandwidth is not additive, it is good when high, bad when low; thus in order to treat it as additive, it must be properly mapped. Consider, for example, a preference for a route that maximizes the minimum bandwidth link on the route, and then prefers a route with the fewest links of each bandwidth from the lowest. If links may be of three discrete bandwidths, "high", "medium" and low", this preference can be achieved, on the assumption that no route will have more than 10 links, with metric values of 1, 10 and 100 for the three bandwidths. If routes can have more than 10 links, the range of metrics must be increased; this indicates a preference for a wide "dynamic range" of link metric values.
Nobody has responded yet so I'll offer an opinion.
I believe that anyone would find that paragraph difficult to understand. It seems to me that the author has used writing techniques designed to confuse the reader and obfuscate the meaning of the text. Techniques such as juxtaposing words that mean the opposite of each other, as in the expression "...maximizes the minimum..." and using other similar writing elements eventually overwhelms the reader with too much mental work to effectively understand the meaning of the text.
It seems that the person who wrote this is either a very poor writer or is intentionally trying to "baffle the readers with bullshit" as is often done by people in professional positions when they don't know what they are talking about. I'd say that whoever wrote that paragraph is attempting sound very knowledgeable and impress people who do not understand the subject. The concepts that are being presented in such a torturous manner are, in fact, very simple. The writer is simply talking about configuring a network route to achieve the greatest performance at the least cost of resources. However when you read the paragraph you come away confused and convinced that the subject matter must be very advanced and complex. It is neither. I suggest that the writer was very confused and unable to express themselves clearly.
Or, I could be wrong.
Last edited by stress_junkie; 07-02-2009 at 04:28 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.