Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
SDN 101: An Introduction to Software Defined Networking
Discover the advantages of SDN.
SDN has quickly become one of the hottest trends in IT. But not all SDN solutions offer real software-defined functionality. As more enterprises consider SDN, they want to know, “What is SDN? And what are the real benefits?” If you're ready to explore the advantages of SDN, and want to know how it should be implemented within your enterprise, start by reading our introductory white paper.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Does /31 subnet mask support really exist in Linux? FYI, I am using the linux version 2.6.34.
As part of my trails, I have two linux boxes connected back to back. I am able to configure the interface addresses with a /31 netmask viz., 192.168.10.4 and 192.168.10.5 successfully. 'ifconfig' output confirms that. But I am not able to ping the other address from 192.168.10.4 and vice-versa.
So, I just doubt if this is really supported? If yes, Am I missing something?
i've always configured 2 host subnets as /30's then there's no conceptual issue here. I'm actually not sure whether a /31 subnet is meant to work according to RFC's (potentially regardless of reality). Does it work on a /30? (shifting the hosts up by one to fit nicely) Can you see any arps coming or going from a tcpdump?
I would say that if it works, congrats, but don't be at all surprised, or annoyed, if it doesn't. I just skimmed over the RFC from 2000 advocating it, and I don't like the idea of it outside of IP space conservation. Can you not use a /30?
Last edited by acid_kewpie; 01-20-2012 at 06:45 AM.
Thanks for your response, Chris. That was helpful.
I am in a necessity to work with /31's as part of my project work. It looks like it works with /30's. With /31's, I don't see any ARPs coming out on the wire. When we configure an interface with a /31 address one end of the link is a broadcast address. Is it because of some validations in the linux kernel code concerning the broadcast addresses that is preventing the (ARP/IP) packets to be sent out? If so, do we need to customize the kernel code to achieve this? Has anyone achieved success in making the /31's work?
We're using /31 on all link networks between Cisco routers - directly connected as well as for IP tunnels. It works well and doubles the ammount of available link networks, which is good in respect to IPv4 depletion. So I would be pleased if it works on Linux too. Does anybody have any experience with it?