Linux - Laptop and NetbookHaving a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Not sure what's going on here or how to find an "error" involved.
Symptoms:
Almost all the time, if I open a window (let's say firefox or terminal windows), the window will come up. Often, the window manager portions (top bar, etc) will not show up, or will not /stay/. If I open a second window, both stop refreshing. Both are still active and accepting input, and I can bring up a right-click menu over things to refresh that portion of the screen.
Often, when bringing up firefox or anything else, the last "refresh" occurs when the window isn't even up yet.
I noticed this also happens more when I'm trying to run in 1024x768 instead of 800x600.
Just recently upgraded (complete re-install) to 9.10. Had Jaunty on it working fine before this and even had Puppy on in just recently ... no problems with either of those.
Any ideas where to look to fix this? The laptop in this configuration is unusable.
Things are pointing towards the graphics driver being used, in my opinion.
if the laptop were positively ANCIENT or slow as hell, I'd be looking at that in general, but if it's the 2GHz laptop in your signature, then age/decrepitness is probably not the problem.
It seems, based on just reading stuff around the net, that 9.10 has a lot of problems in a number of different areas.
For the sake of this discussion, let's pretend that 9.10 is actually working fine generally speaking, and go with my original idea: the video driver.
What have you got in the machine, for a video card? And what driver are you using right now, versus which driver you were using in both Puppy and Jaunty?
Things are pointing towards the graphics driver being used, in my opinion.
if the laptop were positively ANCIENT or slow as hell, I'd be looking at that in general, but if it's the 2GHz laptop in your signature, then age/decrepitness is probably not the problem.
It seems, based on just reading stuff around the net, that 9.10 has a lot of problems in a number of different areas.
For the sake of this discussion, let's pretend that 9.10 is actually working fine generally speaking, and go with my original idea: the video driver.
What have you got in the machine, for a video card? And what driver are you using right now, versus which driver you were using in both Puppy and Jaunty?
Sasha
I've got whatever video card comes with the toshiba (and yes, it's the one in my profile that I'm trying to update, so it's not /horribly/ ancient). I'll have to look it up, but not sure it's even a name brand.
As to the drivers, I'll have to check. In both Jaunty and Puppy, whatever default settings were set up with the install worked great. I never had to change them. Guess I'll have to get an old Jaunty disk and to a livecd to see what it was using by default.
It could well be different per Toshiba laptop (surely they have used more than one type of onboard video) but my Toshiba Satellite has a Trident video card (not great!).. Maybe yours does too? Check the output of:
shell# lspci -v
and note the make/model/version of the card, and post that for us next time you post.
For the record, on my Satellite, I used the VESA driver, because it provided comparable graphics to the Trident driver, and realistically, our trident card is really crappy -- shared memory and all. The Trident driver provided no performance boost.
It could well be different per Toshiba laptop (surely they have used more than one type of onboard video) but my Toshiba Satellite has a Trident video card (not great!).. Maybe yours does too? Check the output of:
shell# lspci -v
and note the make/model/version of the card, and post that for us next time you post.
For the record, on my Satellite, I used the VESA driver, because it provided comparable graphics to the Trident driver, and realistically, our trident card is really crappy -- shared memory and all. The Trident driver provided no performance boost.
Cheers,
Sasha
Well, sorry it's taken me a while to get back to this, but here's what I've found so far:
First, I can't find xorg.conf. Has this been moved, or is my problem that x hasn't been set up somehow? (I was looking in /etc/X11 and subs, but also did a find on the whole computer). Or is Ubuntu using something different now?
As to the lspci output, I was surprised, at that, too, but here's what I got:
Code:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY
Subsystem: Toshiba America Info Systems Device ff00
Flags: bus master, stepping, fast Back2Back, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 5
Hmm. Ok, I know virtually *nothing* about that ATI device, so you'll need either to do some research to see what driver works best for it, or wait till someone who knows, comes in to comment.
As for xorg.conf, it does not exist by default on OS's with very new version of Xorg. On a default such installation, without an xorg.conf, the X server figures out for itself what seems best for your hardware, and sets it up by itself. But, you can still USE an xorg.conf if you want, and you (AFAIK) HAVE to use one if you want to change the configuration of the server to something other than what it thinks is best (such as forcing a particular driver to be used).
Your system should have a command to *generate* an xorg.conf file; something like: sudo dpkg reconfigure xorg but DO NOT quote me on this -- I don't use ubuntu/Debian so you will need to find this correct command yourself, or create an xorg.conf from scratch or from a template.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.