LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Kernel
User Name
Password
Linux - Kernel This forum is for all discussion relating to the Linux kernel.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2010, 08:07 PM   #1
salemboot
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: America
Distribution: Linux
Posts: 161

Rep: Reputation: 36
Thumbs down Regressions / Kernel / Reiserfs


I like to routinely go back to older kernel versions. I've seen some disheartening performance on some of my machines as I upgrade. Something I've noted subconsciously for a while is Reiser slowing down. Then after browsing around I see the following.


http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_33

1.13. Reiserfs de-BKLification

One of the biggest shortcomings of reiserfs v3 (and one of the reasons why most distros use Ext instead) is that its codebase handles concurrency using a single big lock - the BKL (Big Kernel Lock). This means that its SMP scalability is very poor. This release won't fix that issue, but it replaces the BKL with a reiserfs-specific solution. In this release, there are no more traces of the BKL inside reiserfs. It has been converted into a recursive mutex. This sounds dirty but plugging a traditional lock into reiserfs would involve a deeper rewrite as the reiserfs architecture is based on the ugly big kernel lock rules.
Due to the subtle semantics of the locking changes, some workloads may have small performance regressions and other have improvements.

Has anyone noticed other problem areas to look out for?
 
Old 06-02-2010, 01:43 PM   #2
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by salemboot View Post
Has anyone noticed other problem areas to look out for?
Personally, no, not really, but if you look at Phoronix they do track performance regressions in various kernels (amongst other things).
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Autonomously Finding Performance Regressions In The Linux Kernel LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-22-2009 08:31 PM
LXer: Linux: Tracking Regressions LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-21-2007 09:31 PM
LXer: Linux: Releasing With Known Regressions LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-28-2007 03:31 PM
LXer: Linux: Upcoming 2.6.20 Kernel, Tracking Regressions LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-10-2007 01:54 PM
Kernel 2.6, RAID-1 & reiserfs kernel panic Raptor Ramjet Slackware 2 01-04-2004 07:25 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Kernel

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration