Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?


  Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2013, 07:22 AM   #1
Registered: Feb 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 184

Rep: Reputation: 22
Question open source radeon driver has higher precision image quality over closed source fglrx?

Couldn't help but notice a glaring difference in image quality between fglrx and open source radeon driver in the article here:

It looks like the open source driver uses higher precision with better image quality results. The fglrx image output looks pale and bright in comparison (looks washed out and bright; similar to too high gamma values).

You can tell on the picture with the purple guy; the blue on top of wall in background looks more white and pale in the fglrx driver, while it's noticeably blue and fuller on the open source driver (not to mention the purple guy doesn't look overly contrasted). The x1800xl images look the best overall in my opinion.

These pale looking differences are apparent in all those images, and I'm even more suprised to see these differences from my laptop's LCD since I wasn't using one of my CRT's (CRT's have full color production).

So has the open source driver always been slower due to higher precision and less shortcuts in rendering techniques? I'm even more curious with older cards that match fglrx performance right now (like r300 and maybe slightly newer generations); do they use higher precision while being just as fast, as the fglrx drivers?


Last edited by Holering; 08-29-2013 at 08:08 PM.
Old 09-02-2013, 03:34 PM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware & Android
Posts: 7,058

Rep: Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638
Open source Radeon stuff goes through this cycle

Newest cards - not doing them properly yet.
newish but old cards - run well
old & crap cards - YMMV but it's all you get.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fglrx / radeon driver installation troubles on Debian Lenny with Radeon HD 2600 von.hake Linux - Hardware 22 09-30-2010 08:06 AM
xorg-driver-fglrx causes garbled screen Wormboy Linux - Software 5 06-17-2009 07:53 AM
ATI Radeon 7000 AGP 64 MB - Xorg 7.4 won't load with 'radeon' driver highowl Linux - Hardware 2 02-23-2009 10:31 AM
Radeon 9550 + Xorg 6.2.0 + fglrx DRI problem digiplaya Ubuntu 9 09-16-2005 01:36 AM
XOrg-6.8.1 problem with ATI's fglrx-8.8.25 driver??? ginobili_20 Linux From Scratch 4 02-16-2005 02:57 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration