LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2020, 05:07 PM   #16
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled

I did notice this: See how below it says "5" command failed due to icrc error?

I think this has now happened 5 times to me...(where the drive misbehaved like this)

Code:
Pending Defects log (GP Log 0x0c) not supported

SATA Phy Event Counters (GP Log 0x11)
ID      Size     Value  Description
0x0001  2            5  Command failed due to ICRC error
0x0002  2            0  R_ERR response for data FIS
0x0003  2            0  R_ERR response for device-to-host data FIS
0x0004  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS
0x0005  2            0  R_ERR response for non-data FIS
0x0006  2            0  R_ERR response for device-to-host non-data FIS
0x0007  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS
0x0008  2            0  Device-to-host non-data FIS retries
0x0009  2            8  Transition from drive PhyRdy to drive PhyNRdy
0x000a  2            8  Device-to-host register FISes sent due to a COMRESET
0x000b  2            0  CRC errors within host-to-device FIS
0x000d  2            0  Non-CRC errors within host-to-device FIS
0x000f  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS, CRC
0x0010  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS, non-CRC
0x0012  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS, CRC
0x0013  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS, non-CRC
 
Old 12-07-2020, 09:15 PM   #17
computersavvy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,345

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.yepes View Post
I called newegg today and honestly I feel like the gentleman I spoke to had no clue. They basically told me, "well- since you didn't buy our warranty you need to call samsung, here 1800-726-7864". I called them (not being sure if they were open because it is a Sunday) and the automated robot transferred me to a SEAGATE recording (I did not know SAMSUNG drives were SEAGATE??!?) where they told me they were closed. I will call them back tomorrow and see what they say.
If you are still within the 90 day window after purchase newegg will RMA it. If beyond the 90 days then the mfgr warranty applies. I have been through that hassle.
 
Old 12-07-2020, 09:18 PM   #18
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am just outside. 8/25 was my purchase date.
 
Old 12-07-2020, 09:19 PM   #19
computersavvy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,345

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.yepes View Post
I did notice this: See how below it says "5" command failed due to icrc error?

I think this has now happened 5 times to me...(where the drive misbehaved like this)

Code:
Pending Defects log (GP Log 0x0c) not supported

SATA Phy Event Counters (GP Log 0x11)
ID      Size     Value  Description
0x0001  2            5  Command failed due to ICRC error
0x0002  2            0  R_ERR response for data FIS
0x0003  2            0  R_ERR response for device-to-host data FIS
0x0004  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS
0x0005  2            0  R_ERR response for non-data FIS
0x0006  2            0  R_ERR response for device-to-host non-data FIS
0x0007  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS
0x0008  2            0  Device-to-host non-data FIS retries
0x0009  2            8  Transition from drive PhyRdy to drive PhyNRdy
0x000a  2            8  Device-to-host register FISes sent due to a COMRESET
0x000b  2            0  CRC errors within host-to-device FIS
0x000d  2            0  Non-CRC errors within host-to-device FIS
0x000f  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS, CRC
0x0010  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS, non-CRC
0x0012  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS, CRC
0x0013  2            0  R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS, non-CRC
I would be more concerned with lines 9 and a which are probably related.
 
Old 12-08-2020, 06:48 PM   #20
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
One thing- I took apart my box today to double check and make sure all the cable connections were good. I remembered when I saw it that I had bought one of those little adaptor carriages that holds the SSD and makes it fit like an old school hard drive in your rack. My cables install into the carriage, and the hard drive snaps into the carriage like an 8 bit nintendo game. So basically this is acting like an "extension cable" for the sata wiring. I took the hard drive and carriage out, and I cut the end off of the carriage so it is just a mechanical mount adaptor, there is no more circuitry in it. I am testing it now. Maybe this was causing connection problems? This thing was only $7.99 on amazon.
 
Old 12-09-2020, 12:55 PM   #21
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.yepes View Post
One thing- I took apart my box today to double check and make sure all the cable connections were good. I remembered when I saw it that I had bought one of those little adaptor carriages that holds the SSD and makes it fit like an old school hard drive in your rack. My cables install into the carriage, and the hard drive snaps into the carriage like an 8 bit nintendo game. So basically this is acting like an "extension cable" for the sata wiring. I took the hard drive and carriage out, and I cut the end off of the carriage so it is just a mechanical mount adaptor, there is no more circuitry in it. I am testing it now. Maybe this was causing connection problems?
Seems likely.
 
Old 12-13-2020, 01:12 AM   #22
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Update - drive acted up again tonight, the "carraige" was not in between the sata cable and drive so this has been removed from the equation. I will be buying a replacement drive tonight and sending this back to Samsung.
 
Old 12-16-2020, 06:22 PM   #23
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Update- I replaced the drive and I am trying to work with Samsung for a replacement or repair. I bought a WD 500GB SSD "red" this time. I just clonezilla'ed my samsung to the WD drive and I am actually booted into and using the WD-RED now. Let's see if the problem comes back. I will update you all once I know what samsung does. Obviously I should nuke the samsung drive before I send it back (I don't want my personal info accessed).
 
Old 12-31-2020, 11:58 PM   #24
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Update- been running with the WD "RED" 500gb ssd for about 2 weeks now, no issues so far.

Funny thing samsung took the drive back for a "warranty repair" I got it back today from UPS. The paperwork that came with the drive indicates that it passed all of their testing and they simply just updated the firmware. Do you guys have any other thoughts on this?
 
Old 01-01-2021, 07:19 AM   #25
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Are you sure it's the same drive?
Maybe they just gave you a new one instead of repairing it.
 
Old 01-01-2021, 08:03 AM   #26
GPGAgent
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2018
Location: Surrey UK
Distribution: Mint 20 xfce 64bit
Posts: 1,026
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Always mark anything you send back for repair in a way only you know. Or keep a note of it's serial number. Then you'll know if it's your drive or a replacement which may not be new.

Did you actually wipe it before sending it back? You said "Obviously I should nuke the samsung drive before I send it back (I don't want my personal info accessed)."
 
Old 01-01-2021, 08:31 AM   #27
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
^ nuke and wipe aren't the same thing IMO.
Nuke: destroy the MBR, making the data unusable
Wipe: overwrite every sector of the device
 
Old 01-01-2021, 08:34 AM   #28
o770
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.yepes View Post
Do you guys have any other thoughts on this?
How is the SMART report on the new drive, is everything ok?
I think most SATA controllers were already version II on year 2010, however your system's report is showing this for the EVO drive:
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.yepes View Post
Code:
SATA Version is:  SATA 3.2, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 1.5 Gb/s)
Is that right for your specs?

Last edited by o770; 01-01-2021 at 08:35 AM.
 
Old 01-01-2021, 08:52 AM   #29
GPGAgent
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2018
Location: Surrey UK
Distribution: Mint 20 xfce 64bit
Posts: 1,026
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho View Post
^ nuke and wipe aren't the same thing IMO.
Nuke: destroy the MBR, making the data unusable
Wipe: overwrite every sector of the device
how about wipe and nuke then?
 
Old 01-01-2021, 01:01 PM   #30
k.yepes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2020
Distribution: mint
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Before I sent the drive in I took it to work and connected it to a work PC. I deleted all he partitions, formatted the drive, and then used SHRED command to write random data across the drive 4 full times before changing it to all zeros.

Of course I took a picture of all of the numbers before I shipped it back, and looking at what they returned everything matches.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fedora keeps going into read-only mode: is my ssd on its way out? Erdward Linux - Newbie 15 12-31-2018 08:47 PM
kvm natted network going offline at random times krazyivan Linux - Server 2 06-08-2014 06:19 PM
[SOLVED] fstab options for "write once, read many times" partition? tigerflag Linux - Hardware 6 07-10-2013 11:47 AM
Random hardfreeze at random times - Dell e6500 Capt_Krill Slackware 5 05-07-2012 09:30 PM
crontab once per week and once per month? qwertyjjj Linux - Newbie 3 12-15-2011 04:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration