Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Using an Intel i5 quad core, I switched from 32-bit Mint 14 to 64-bit Mint 15. I notice the CPU temperatures, as measured by "sensors" are about 10 C lower when idle (down from 43 to 33 in a room temperature of about 22).
This has nothing to do with the switch from 32 to 64 bit, but with the switch from Mint 14 to Mint 15, which uses a newer kernel. Intel is has made quite some changes to the code for power management on newer Core i-CPUs (Sandy-/Ivybridge and Haswell).
My cheap dual core Pentium B960 uses Sandy Bridge and runs cool as a cucumber too. You might find cpu frequency scaling fails completely on older hardware like my AMD Turion Ultra, however. Might make sense to use old kernels and drivers with old hardware and new with new. Backwards compatibility testing just isn't being done I guess. Linus probably hasn't used anything under 1 GHz in a decade.
Well, part of it might be the 64 bit switch. One of the choices made for 64 bit was it didn't have to include any of the very old legacy machines in many of the apps and drivers. So some configuration settings have been made with only 64 bit systems in compile. Some apps and drivers were made for 64 bit with newest compilers and faster running code.
As above the newer kernel had a lot of choices when it was built too that didn't need to include legacy systems.
While the memory use may have increased the actual use of resources has gone down.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.