Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?


  Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2009, 05:37 PM   #16
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: USA and Italy
Distribution: Debian testing/sid; OpenSuSE; Fedora; Mint
Posts: 5,480

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Post LVM Advantages

Originally Posted by asuderma View Post
So I just decided to put the drive back in the other box and pull the data to a USB drive. Took me freaking forever, but now I have my data. I will keep in mind the whole LVM thing next time I need to do this. When did linux distros start using the LVM by default, and what are the advantages to using it?
LVM is good because if you need more space on an LVM, you just add a drive to the LVM. LVM can be any combination of drives, even spanning machines, or ATA over ethernet. You could add a flash drive to a LVM. I don't believe optical drives work with LVM, but they might.

LVM has special tools you need to do simple operations. Once a person learns to use the tools, LVM is a piece of cake. But in this instance it can be a pain. Once a LVM is made, it isn't meant to be pulled apart in pieces, and mixed and matched on another LVM.

For most users discrete file systems are more flexible. But if someone is running an enterprise system, with no idea of how much storage space might be needed in the future, or if storage needs change wildy, LVM makes sense.

For instance, you want to make a storage device out of 3 raid arrays, with the option to add more. You just make a LVM out of the 3 external arrays. In the future you can add more arrays as needed.

What I don't like is that some distros make LVM the install default. Most people cannot benefit from LVM, so this default just drives support calls. That gets more people to pay for support, but it's really just a pain for everyone.
Old 10-13-2009, 05:40 PM   #17
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Colorado
Distribution: CentOS 6.2
Posts: 20

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0

Thanks for the great information and all of your help here. You guys are the reason I joined this site.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it necessary to partition a drive in use w/ LVM? stgrob Linux - Enterprise 7 01-09-2008 06:35 PM
Moving LVM partition to larger hard drive blainehilton Fedora 2 11-20-2007 03:36 PM
resize partition XP with sata drive organmorgan Linux - Newbie 6 02-16-2007 02:50 PM
Sata drive not working in LVM crofty13 Linux - Software 2 06-15-2006 06:31 AM
vFat partition trouble on SATA drive WarmFlatSprite Linux - Hardware 4 09-28-2004 09:35 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration