Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Ubuntu, ElemntaryOS, Linux Mint, openSUSE, Xubuntu
Posts: 56
Rep:
ATI or Nvidia chipset?
I'm upgrading my computer which is somewhat ancient by modern standards. Among other things I'm getting a new graphics cards. I just don't quite know which chipset I want.
Years ago - the last time I needed to consider such issues - I went for an Nvidia-based graphics card, as I was warned against ATI cards in Linux: "Don't go there... you'll be in a world of pain."
Now, I'm considering getting a ATI Radeon X1900GT-based graphics card, and needless to say I'd like to know if the warning I was given years ago is still valid, or if things have improved "sufficiently" in the meantime?
Perhaps the best thing to do would be to search for recent posts about ATI and nVidia drivers here at LQ - that should give you a decent idea of what kinds of expereiences others are encountering.
In brief, ATI has apparently improved their level of Linux support compared to how it was a couple of years ago, however, this is only true for part of their product line - their current Linux drivers are only designed to work with certain cards, and any non-supported cards will remain, well, non-supported. In contrast, nVidia traditionally has offered drivers for their full product line. Overall, look before you leap, and you'll want to be sure that whatever card you buy has Linux support. Good luck with it
I just had to switch from a ATI Radeon 8500 due to it no longer being supported. Sheesh, the card is only six years old! I got an Nvidia because I don't want the driver support to end after such a short period.
Distribution: Ubuntu, ElemntaryOS, Linux Mint, openSUSE, Xubuntu
Posts: 56
Original Poster
Rep:
Well - the comments on ATI support for Linux that I've found on the Internet have not exactly convinced me that ATI is the way to go - even though the X1900 series is officially supported by ATI's Linux drivers, the general performance of these drivers is apparently often quite poor compared to their Windows counterparts, both in terms of speed as well as various features that are disabled or not working. Furthermore, it seems that what Phobox experienced is actually a common occurence: An ATI GPU is deemed obsolete - by ATI - and support for it is removed from the drivers.
Taking all of this into consideration, I think I'll choose an Nvidia-based card instead.
I don't understend why did you decide to buy so powerful video for using in linux. IMO - X1900GT is 100% gaming solution for playing modern games under Windows with directX 9-10
__________________ Best camera deals - Map of world - bank of americaoffset mortgage
Last edited by Tommy90210; 06-21-2007 at 09:15 AM.
I don't understend why did you decide to buy so powerful video for using in linux. IMO - X1900GT is 100% gaming solution for playing modern games under Windows with directX 9-10
Why for gaming of course !!
Don't you play games on your Linux box ? I think it's a great stress reliever.
I currently have native Linux versions of Quake, Quake2, Quake3, UT, UT2004, Savage, Neverwinter Nights, and various other 3D accelerated games installed and very playable. I'll save the basic Graphics cards for my servers, and the good ones for my workstation/gaming machine.
I just had to switch from a ATI Radeon 8500 due to it no longer being supported. Sheesh, the card is only six years old! I got an Nvidia because I don't want the driver support to end after such a short period.
NVidia has dropped support for my GTS card, which is only about 6 years old and works just fine for me. So I guess that duration of support can't be a discriminator.
Distribution: Ubuntu, ElemntaryOS, Linux Mint, openSUSE, Xubuntu
Posts: 56
Original Poster
Rep:
My machine does in fact dual boot Windows, but I would certainly like to be able to run more games in Linux, which is my primary system - sometimes I don't play a game just because I can't be bothered to reboot
This used to be an issue for me as well.
Back to when I was playing 3D games under windows,
but I grew tired of the 'upgrade' frenzy and ever
growing requirements for Direct3D support of this or that
feature who just happen to be the hype for a new game.
My Windows box lives happy; Dual-boot TnT2 + Linux,
and I leave 3D gaming to a painless hassle-free Xbox;
That could have been a PS2, it's only a matter of preference.
I also have another box powered by a P4 over an ATI 9800Pro.
My reason was to get ready for OpenGL 2.0..
I think Linux is still way to far from providing the same
level of satisfaction we get from a 3D console, or a dedicated
Windows gamer's box.
I would not spend so much on a 3D card just for Linux gaming.
IMHO, it's only worth it if you are a PC gamer running also
Windoze environment.
If you are into 3D programming, of course your ambition is
the limit, and Nvidia still offer faster 3D under Linux.
NVidia has dropped support for my GTS card, which is only about 6 years old and works just fine for me. So I guess that duration of support can't be a discriminator.
NVidia has dropped support for my GTS card, which is only about 6 years old and works just fine for me. So I guess that duration of support can't be a discriminator.
really? because I have a nvidia GTS card in my server computer and it works just fine with the latest binary drivers downloaded right from nvidia.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.