Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
As specified per the amd installer instructions, I uninstalled the previous driver, ran the installer (.run shell script), then aticonfig --initial and rebooted.
Apparently there is no error while generating the driver (fglrx.ko) as per the log file in /usr/share/ati.
But amdcccle complains it cannot initialize apparently because there is no driver, and ask to either install the hardware (which was already in place!) rerun aticonfig.
I did run it again and it displayed the same 3 lines:
Uninitialised file found, configuring.
Using /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Saved back-up to /etc/X11/xorg.conf.original-7
(as you can see, it is not the first time I do this!)
I have the latest fedora 7 (2.6.22.1-41.fc7) on a x86_64 machine. I'm desperate to be able to run ccc. May anyone help me please?
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
No you really did not miss anything except for the fact you can and should use the ati-x11-drv rpm package from freshrpms; http://moonshine.freshrpms.net/
This makes life a bit easier, no need to redo the ati driver installation after a kernel update for one. Uninstall the ati driver as you have done for the older version and install the rpm package.
I followed what you said.
As far as I could observe, I apparently got no problem during the install.
However I doubt it worked successfully.
(note that I rebooted my machine to be sure)
Also, I don't know how to verify if:
- the installation effectively worked?
- hardware-acceleration is active?
- ati driver is active?
- there are any tools or programs that come with the install?
As far as I can see, most 3D screen-savers are running slow. That's the only way I can guess something is not configured correctly.
As I mentionned before, I uninstalled the driver I downloaded from the ATI site few days ago.
Tonight, I removed all xorg-drv-* packages I had installed. (even -mouse and -keyboard, etc.)
I made several tests with different xorg.conf; I even removed it (renamed it , actually) and surprisingly, "yum install ati-x11-drv" does not even create one!
In the last 2 hours, I made more than 10 tentatives to install and remove ati-x11-drv with different xorg.conf setups.
Now that I removed the xorg-X11-drv package, I can no more use "radeon"; and since "fglrx" still does not work, I'm stuck with "vesa" and a 800x600 max screen resolution 8v(
I don't know what to do next?
Note: When I put "fglrx" in xorg.conf and I restart X, first it fails. Then it tries to setup something up and while it is doing, I get some messages like:
Code:
Could'nt start X on card 0
Could'nt start X on card 1
Could'nt start X on card 1 with old config, trying a fresh config
At this moment, X kicks in, asking for my preferred resolution (in some kind of gnome dialog where I can choose my graphic card's driver). There I find 2 choices: fglrx and vesa. (before there was also radeon; it vanished since I remove the xorg-x11-drv package)
In that menu, If I choose fglrx, it does not work and the setup program start over again. The only solution that works now is vesa. (...unless I reinstall the xorg-x11-drv package in order to get back to a normal 1280x1024 resolution)
As far as I know, I have a single graphic card ATI 9600 (agp). I don't think I have an on-board graphic card (I see no other rgb output, except something that looks like an RCA jack). I also have a TV card (pci) and it is working fine.
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AP [Rade
on 9600]
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AP [Radeon 9600
] (Secondary)
and a piece of dmesg:
Code:
fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starn
berg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 922 MBytes.
[fglrx] USWC is disabled in module parameters
[fglrx] PAT is disabled!
[fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.40.4 [Jul 31 2007] on minor 0
Last edited by maitrebart; 09-01-2007 at 08:29 AM.
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Quote:
I made several tests with different xorg.conf; I even removed it (renamed it , actually) and surprisingly, "yum install ati-x11-drv" does not even create one!
Why would this be a surprise?????, this is a graphics driver only and not a configuration tool. To configure the graphics interface use system-config-display, for example;
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.