*BSDThis forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi everyone !
I am using Ubuntu for more than a year and also using Linux mint and Bodhi in live medium for some time.A good friend of mine advised me to get acquainted with BSD.So I am thinking to use and learn BSD OS. But the problem is I don't know which one to chose.There is Free BSD,Open BSD,Net BSD,Midnight BSD,Dragonfly BSD and Ghost BSD to chose from.
So, guys please tell me which one will suit me best.I will be using it for learning the OS and some programming and also some general stuff. I want to dualboot it with windows 8 in a 64 bit HP laptop having 3red gen i5 processor,1GB AMD radeon graphics and 4 GB ram .Is it possible to dual boot BSD along with windows, if yes then how do I do it ?
UbuntuBSD is GNU + the FreeBSD kernel, it's more like GNU/Linux than like BSD. It's called GNU/kFreeBSD for that reason. It's good on servers, and it's got no systemd. It's interesting and I hope the project goes well.
But that aside, the there is a compatibility layer in FreeBSD that might allow you to inject security holes like Skype. Jitsi and some others probably run well.
PC-BSD might be the way to go if you want a gentle introduction to the desktop. If you want a really good learning experience, especially with C, then OpenBSD is the way to go. It is the most organized inside and out. However, it is more oriented to self-sufficient activity, especially C programmers that want to hack on their own systems. On hardware it works on, it works very well. But on other hardware, not so much. If you are looking for more of a generic community like with the GNU/Linuxes, then PC-BSD (aka FreeBSD) is more the way to go. But even with PC-BSD (FreeBSD) you will have less hardware options than with GNU/Linux.
Yes, I agree. I ran FreeBSD on a laptop for a few years, and it served me well. It's a good intro to BSD, and "encourages" (forces) you to learn how to set it up and maintain it. Their handbook is excellent reading, and truly is one of the best introductions to UNIX available.
I would also recommend starting with FreeBSD. The FreeBSD handbook is one of the best pieces of documentation I've seen. PCBSD, which is FreeBSD respun for desktop use, would be a good second choice (when you run the PCBSD update routine, it checks the Free BSD mirrors for updates).
There is Free BSD,Open BSD,Net BSD,Midnight BSD,Dragonfly BSD and Ghost BSD to chose from.
FreeBSD is my favorite among all those options. There's a bit of a learning curve for Linux users, but it's not really all that bad. Hope you'll enjoy running BSD.
Free/PC-BSD is a good place to start into the BSDs. FreeBSD has a good deal of support for hardware. It also has ZFS support, has great support from Nvidia, and has a lot of compatibility layers with Linux based apps.
I will warn you BSD is NOT like Linux based systems in various ways, so read the handbook BEFORE you install thoroughly. A lot of stuff will work the same, and equally, a lot will not.
I will suggest you dual boot or virtualize a BSD system to try it out first.
Distribution: Mepis and Fedora, also Mandrake and SuSE PC-BSD Mint Solaris 11 express
Posts: 385
Rep:
Just do PC-BSD if you want to learn UNIX. It has all the GUI desktops all of us Linux people know and love. (KDE xfce Cinnamon LXDE MaTE etc etc)
Underneath that, the CLI is 100% intact and complete. If you want to learn the command line, there is no need to sacrifice the GUI. Even an older 32 bit machine with just 1 or 2 gigs of RAM and a single core CPU will run just fine. Overall, PC-BSD seems to be just a bit slower than Mint. The hardware list is probably less so test all your accessories and hardware before committing.
There will come a time when you just want to watch a movie or go to Amazon. You'll be happy to have the GUI. Best of all, all the codecs work & I have yet to find one that is missing. Deciding between Mint and PC-BSD is always a tough decision!!
There's nothing not to like. There is a stripped down server only option available which is basically just the BASH shell and nothing else. Even if I was doing a small server, I see no need for it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.