UNR vs Eeebuntu vs fluxflux-eee vs ? Distro's for Netbooks,etc- which is the best??
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
As far as netbooks go, I grabbed an HP 110 as an xmas gift, threw Slackware -current with xfce on it, and I'd *really* like to keep it for myself. As a matter of fact, if and when my current lappy expires, or gets a lateral transfer in my scheme of things, I'm grabbing one of these babies for me. The beauty of this HP netbook is that the keyboard is 92% the size of a regular keyboard, which goes a long way towards eliminating one of the most complained about netbook faults.
I'm a bit leery about the interfaces that unr, easypeasy, moblin, etc. are going with. I really don't see any need to deviate from the *standard* panel/dock style IFs commonplace across the pc platform, be it osx, windows, gnome, kde, etc. etc.
Whilst I can understand the goals of these remix interfaces, it seems to create a *toyish* look to the netbook, and helps to understate its function as a *real* computer that is suitable for 99% of the general public's overall computer use (browsing, email, im, and sporadic document creation.)
- mrclisdue -
Understand yr sentiments, but I thought that the interface was (is) explained somewhere as an attempt to get the tech-less masses to try-and-then-love linux. I have been helping some of the above to move away from the Dark Side, and the 'toy' distro was a knight in shining armor...the flood of questions moved to a trickle!
I'd like to place an order for a vanilla slack -current live netbook usbstick.
+1
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjturner
- mrclisdue -
Understand yr sentiments, but I thought that the interface was (is) explained somewhere as an attempt to get the tech-less masses to try-and-then-love linux.
I thought it was designed as a space saver. As netbooks have small screensn (600 pixels high originally), a menubar takes space that can be used in a better way. But I might be wrong.
I don't have any negative feelings about the UNR desktop on my Aspire One after I figured out that clicking the Ubuntu logo minimizes all windows and shows the desktop so I can get to the 'menu'. On bigger screens, I prefer the normal Gnome interface.
I use Kuki (Ubuntu+Xfce, with other enhancements) on mine and have no serious complaints so far. The only problems are that the ethernet adapter doesn't work, it's slightly slow, and there are no kernel sources available for the custom kernel, meaning no VBox or anything requiring them.
I would really prefer Arch + XMonad, but I'm in college and I can't have my main note taking system going down for extended periods of time.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.