LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-08-2011, 11:18 PM   #1
Drone4four
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Manjaro
Posts: 205

Rep: Reputation: 30
mounting root file system at boot: error w/ fstab (not fdisk)


I recently installed a Oneiric based Linux distro. It booted fine until I changed my fstab. I altered my fstab so I could access my ntfs and other Linux partitions. Now when I boot in recovery mode, it hangs after 2 or 3 seconds with this message:

Code:
Begin: Running /scripts/init-premount … done
Begin:  Mounting root file system ...
And then it just hangs there forever until I press the reset button on my PC. I figure that I am getting this error because I didn’t configure my fstab correctly. Here is what my fstab looks like:

Code:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>       <dump>  <pass>
proc            /proc           proc    nodev,noexec,nosuid 0       0
# / was on /dev/sda7 during installation
/dev/sda7        /               reiserfs notail          0       1
# / was on UUID=ef73f69f-1518-4c85-967d-2ed64c157ef1 after installation
# swap was on /dev/sda6 during installation
UUID=7208caa3-3b2a-4134-a114-23cf92c1238d none            swap    sw              0       0
/dev/sda3        /home/winxp     ntfs-3g        defaults    0 0
/dev/sdb1        /home/ntfs2tb    ntfs-3g        defaults    0 0
/dev/sda2         /home/slack/    ext4        noatime     0 0
# deleted: /dev/sda5        /home/gentoo    ext3        noatime        0 0
Even if ‘/dev/sda7’ is replaced with ‘UUID=ef73f69f-1518-4c85-967d-2ed64c157ef1’, I get the same error message on boot. I foolishly didn't back up my fstab before changing it so I have nothing to revert back to.

I tried adding # to the beginning of all the lines in my fstab except the line for swap and for root. My fstab therefore looks like this:

Code:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>       <dump>  <pass>
proc            /proc           proc    nodev,noexec,nosuid 0       0
# / was on /dev/sda7 during installation
#UUID=ef73f69f-1518-4c85-967d-2ed64c157ef1
/dev/sda7        /               reiserfs notail          0       1
# swap was on /dev/sda6 during installation
UUID=7208caa3-3b2a-4134-a114-23cf92c1238d none            swap    sw              0       0
# /dev/sda3        /home/winxp     ntfs-3g        defaults    0 0
# /dev/sdb1        /home/ntfs2tb    ntfs-3g        defaults    0 0
# /dev/sda2         /home/slack/    ext4        noatime     0 0
# deleted: /dev/sda5        /home/gentoo    ext3        noatime        0 0
With this fstab, it still chokes at boot at around the 3 second mark with the same error message.

Here is the output of parted -l and fdisk -l from my LiveDVD:

Code:
mint@mint ~ $ sudo parted -l
Model: ATA WDC WD3200AAKS-0 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 320GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End     Size    Type      File system     Flags
1      32.3kB  321MB   321MB   primary   ext2            boot
2      321MB   39.3GB  39.0GB  primary   ext4
3      39.3GB  78.3GB  39.0GB  primary   ntfs
4      78.3GB  320GB   242GB   extended
6      78.3GB  94.3GB  16.0GB  logical   linux-swap(v1)
7      94.3GB  218GB   124GB   logical   reiserfs
5      218GB   320GB   102GB   logical   ntfs


Model: ATA WDC WD20EARS-00J (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End     Size    Type     File system  Flags
1      32.3kB  2000GB  2000GB  primary  ntfs


Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system).  /dev/sr0
has been opened read-only.
Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label                                  

mint@mint ~ $ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320071851520 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders, total 625140335 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00087335

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *          63      626534      313236   83  Linux
/dev/sda2          626535    76790699    38082082+  83  Linux
/dev/sda3        76790700   152954864    38082082+   7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4       152954878   625135615   236090369    5  Extended
/dev/sda5       426477568   625135615    99329024    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6       152954880   184205311    15625216   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda7       184207360   426477567   121135104   83  Linux

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000cc3

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1              63  3907024064  1953512001    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
mint@mint ~ $
What am I doing wrong?

I tried posting in the Linux Mint forums, but no one has replied with a solution so I thought I would try here. I hope that's not a problem.

Last edited by Drone4four; 12-09-2011 at 09:22 PM.
 
Old 12-09-2011, 08:05 AM   #2
smallpond
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 4,149

Rep: Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264
Good idea to comment out the unneeded lines in fstab, but the partition you are missing is:

Code:
1      32.3kB  321MB   321MB   primary   ext2            boot
This most likely contains your ram image and kernel, and is the only one marked bootable in your partition table. It's usually mounted on /boot. My guess is you accidentally deleted the line when you made your edits. Should look something like:

Code:
/dev/sda1 /boot                   ext2    defaults        1 2
 
Old 12-09-2011, 02:26 PM   #3
Drone4four
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Manjaro
Posts: 205

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
fdisk says that /dev/sda1 is set as the bootable partition. So it would be reasonable to assume that it contains my ram image and kernel....but upon closer analysis -- with that drive mounted using my LiveCD -- the contents of /dev/sda1 mounted as /boot show that all the files are dated from early 2010, when I was playing around with Gentoo. Check it:

Code:
mint@mint ~ $ sudo mount /dev/sda1 /boot
mint@mint ~ $ cd /boot/
mint@mint /boot $ ls
boot
grub
grub.bak
initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
lost+found
splash
System.map-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
mint@mint /boot $ cd grub
mint@mint /boot/grub $ ls
default           grub.conf.bak                  stage1
device.map        grub.conf.bakapril4-2010.conf  stage2
e2fs_stage1_5     iso9660_stage1_5               stage2_eltorito
fat_stage1_5      jfs_stage1_5                   ufs2_stage1_5
ffs_stage1_5      menu.lst                       vstafs_stage1_5
grub.conf         minix_stage1_5                 xfs_stage1_5
grub.conf~        reiserfs_stage1_5
grub.conf.backup  splash.xpm.gz
mint@mint /boot/grub $ ls -l
total 340
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    197 2010-02-25 21:27 default
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     30 2010-02-25 21:11 device.map
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   8760 2010-02-25 21:27 e2fs_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7836 2010-02-25 21:27 fat_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7112 2010-02-25 21:27 ffs_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    464 2010-03-09 01:20 grub.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    580 2010-03-09 01:20 grub.conf~
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    527 2010-03-07 21:59 grub.conf.backup
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    593 2010-03-08 02:14 grub.conf.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    464 2010-04-04 21:56 grub.conf.bakapril4-2010.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7104 2010-02-25 21:27 iso9660_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   8692 2010-02-25 21:27 jfs_stage1_5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      9 2010-02-25 21:11 menu.lst -> grub.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7328 2010-02-25 21:27 minix_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   9732 2010-02-25 21:27 reiserfs_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  33856 2010-02-25 21:10 splash.xpm.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    512 2010-02-25 21:27 stage1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 107892 2010-02-25 21:27 stage2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 107892 2010-02-25 21:10 stage2_eltorito
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7368 2010-02-25 21:27 ufs2_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   6712 2010-02-25 21:27 vstafs_stage1_5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   9532 2010-02-25 21:27 xfs_stage1_5
mint@mint /boot/grub $ cd ..
mint@mint /boot $ ls -l
total 7776
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       1 2009-09-05 17:14 boot -> .
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    1024 2010-04-04 21:56 grub
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    1024 2010-02-25 21:05 grub.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3491923 2010-03-08 02:01 initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2816128 2010-02-24 03:55 kernel-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
drwx------ 2 root root   12288 2009-09-05 16:36 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    1024 2010-03-07 21:59 splash
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1600763 2010-02-24 03:55 System.map-genkernel-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
mint@mint /boot $
smallpond: I will go ahead with your advice anyways and add this entry to my fstab:

Code:
/dev/sda1 /boot                   ext2    defaults        1 2
My new fstab therefore looks like this:

Code:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>       <dump>  <pass>
proc            /proc           proc    nodev,noexec,nosuid 0       0
/dev/sda1 /boot                   ext2    defaults        1 2
# / was on /dev/sda7 during installation
UUID=1ad64730-ac97-42a3-8420-8e8707456937 /               ext4    errors=remount-ro 0       1
# swap was on /dev/sda6 during installation
UUID=7208caa3-3b2a-4134-a114-23cf92c1238d none            swap    sw              0       0
/dev/sda3		/home/winxp     ntfs-3g		defaults	0 0
/dev/sdb1		/home/ntfs2tb	ntfs-3g		defaults	0 0
/dev/sda2 		/home/slack/    ext4		noatime 	0 0
# deleted: /dev/sda5		/home/gentoo	ext3		noatime		0 0
I will now reboot my computer and see what happens. I will report back here with the results.

btw, the contents of /boot in my lisa partition on /dev/sda7 looks like this:

Code:
mint@mint ~ $ cd /mnt/lisa/boot/
mint@mint /mnt/lisa/boot $ ls -l
total 21898
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   730503 2011-10-07 20:02 abi-3.0.0-12-generic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   134754 2011-10-07 20:02 config-3.0.0-12-generic
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root     6288 2011-12-02 23:01 grub
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13804061 2011-12-03 01:31 initrd.img-3.0.0-12-generic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   176764 2011-05-02 23:07 memtest86+.bin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   178944 2011-05-02 23:07 memtest86+_multiboot.bin
-rw------- 1 root root  2694177 2011-10-07 20:02 System.map-3.0.0-12-generic
-rw------- 1 root root     1367 2011-10-07 20:08 vmcoreinfo-3.0.0-12-generic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  4658096 2011-11-24 19:13 vmlinuz-3.0.0-12-generic
mint@mint /mnt/lisa/boot $

Last edited by Drone4four; 12-09-2011 at 02:45 PM.
 
Old 12-09-2011, 02:47 PM   #4
Drone4four
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Manjaro
Posts: 205

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I can conclusively say that adding this to my fstab:

Code:
/dev/sda1 /boot                   ext2    defaults        1 2
...doesn't allow me to get past the error I reported initially. Recovery mode still hangs at the 3 second mark. What else could I try?

Last edited by Drone4four; 12-09-2011 at 02:49 PM.
 
Old 12-09-2011, 05:55 PM   #5
smallpond
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 4,149

Rep: Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264
Well. Not having any bootable partition seems like a problem. Shouldn't one of the others be marked bootable, then?
 
Old 12-09-2011, 07:25 PM   #6
Drone4four
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Manjaro
Posts: 205

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Not having a bootable partition does seem like a problem, yes. But my theory is that it’s separate from the problem I am having with my fstab. The initial error that I reported and the error I continue to experience despite my troubleshooting efforts is that the O/S can’t mount the root file system. My O/S loads premount init scripts and does a lot of other things which means, in my humble opinion, that it has nothing to do with GRUB. Since GRUB activates at boot allowing me to load Windows 7, Slackware 1337, Lisa and Lisa (recovery mode) I think the problem is with my fstab. If the bootable flag wasn’t set properly, as you suggest smallpond, then GRUB should be giving me one of it’s famous errors that can be found here: http://www.uruk.org/orig-grub/errors.html

Maybe I really don’t know know what I’m talking about. Maybe you’re right, smallpond. Question: How would I go about marking /dev/sda7 as bootable? Answer: Using fdisk. Since /dev/sda7 is the drive which has a fresh install of 64-bit Lisa, that’s the drive I want to mark bootable. My problem is I don’t know how to use fdisk. Here are the input, output and errors I get whilst using fdisk with my LiveDVD:

Code:
mint@mint ~ $ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320071851520 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders, total 625140335 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00087335

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *          63      626534      313236   83  Linux
/dev/sda2          626535    76790699    38082082+  83  Linux
/dev/sda3        76790700   152954864    38082082+   7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4       152954878   625135615   236090369    5  Extended
/dev/sda5       426477568   625135615    99329024    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6       152954880   184205311    15625216   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda7       184207360   426477567   121135104   83  Linux

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000cc3

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1              63  3907024064  1953512001    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
mint@mint ~ $ sudo fdisk /dev/sda7

Command (m for help): m
Command action
  a   toggle a bootable flag
  b   edit bsd disklabel
  c   toggle the dos compatibility flag
  d   delete a partition
  l   list known partition types
  m   print this menu
  n   add a new partition
  o   create a new empty DOS partition table
  p   print the partition table
  q   quit without saving changes
  s   create a new empty Sun disklabel
  t   change a partition's system id
  u   change display/entry units
  v   verify the partition table
  w   write table to disk and exit
  x   extra functionality (experts only)

Command (m for help): a
Partition number (1-4): 1
Warning: partition 1 has empty type

Command (m for help): a
Partition number (1-4): 2
Warning: partition 2 has empty type

Command (m for help): a
Partition number (1-4): 3
Warning: partition 3 has empty type

Command (m for help): a   
Partition number (1-4): 4
Warning: partition 4 has empty type

Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered!

Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.

WARNING: Re-reading the partition table failed with error 22: Invalid argument.
The kernel still uses the old table. The new table will be used at
the next reboot or after you run partprobe(8) or kpartx(8)
Syncing disks.
mint@mint ~ $ sudo fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320071851520 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders, total 625140335 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00087335

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *          63      626534      313236   83  Linux
/dev/sda2          626535    76790699    38082082+  83  Linux
/dev/sda3        76790700   152954864    38082082+   7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4       152954878   625135615   236090369    5  Extended
/dev/sda5       426477568   625135615    99329024    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6       152954880   184205311    15625216   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda7       184207360   426477567   121135104   83  Linux

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000cc3

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1              63  3907024064  1953512001    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
mint@mint ~ $
What does that “Warning: partition ‘x’ has empty type” mean? And what does error 22: Invalid argument mean? I Googled it but I can’t figure out what it means. What should I try next?
 
Old 12-09-2011, 09:21 PM   #7
Drone4four
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Manjaro
Posts: 205

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I asked in ##Linux on FreeNode and a number of idlers came forward and said that you are out to lunch, smallpond. Here is the dialogue (cropped):

Quote:
<Drone4four> question: how would i go about marking /dev/sda7 as bootable? answer: use fdisk. my problem is i don’t know how to use fdisk. Instead of using a pastebin, you can check out the ugly error message i have run into at this forum thread: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...-fdisk-917833/
<[R]> Drone4four: why do you think youi need to make a partition as "bootable"?
<[R]> mark*
<Drone4four> [R]: b/c fdisk says that /dev/sda1 is marked as bootable and i haven't used it in at least a year. i'm trying to get grub to load linux now on a different partition
<[R]> Drone4four: grub does not care about the bootable flag
<[R]> thats just for windows nonsense
<Drone4four> [R]: that's what i thought....but someone in my forum thread thought otherwise
<[R]> Drone4four: obviously that person is full of crap and/or just plain is a moron
<Drone4four> diegoviola, [R]: i think that your both being a little harsh...maybe he is just new to linux in comparison
<Drone4four> =D
<tsolox> be kind to animals
<[R]> if you are talking our your bum
<[R]> you shouldn't be giving advice
<br0adcast> lol
<br0adcast> thats the internet fellas, opinions are like assholes, everybody has one
<phobos_anomaly> Drone4four: If he is new, he wouldn't be trying to help with boot issues.
<phobos_anomaly> ergo since hes trying to help and giving out bad advice, hes a damn fool.
<[R]> br0adcast: giving retarded advice isn't an opinion...
<br0adcast> well sure it is
<phobos_anomaly> br0adcast: watch the language
<br0adcast> his opinion is that... yadda yadda..
<br0adcast> his advice surely is his opinion
<br0adcast> sorry phobos_anomaly, wont happen again.
<diegoviola> Drone4four: well that person then should come here to learn, in that case
<Drone4four> well could you folks take a look at my thread and offer some advice....I think what i need to do to solve my problem is to generate a default fstab from a LiveCD. how would I go about doing that?
<br0adcast> but regardless, be it an opinion or not, no excuse for giving useless info
<br0adcast> ok, then my apologies phobos ^
 
Old 12-10-2011, 02:39 PM   #8
smallpond
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 4,149

Rep: Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264
Your friends are correct that the Linux bootloader does not need the boot flag. However, if you have dual-boot with Windows 7, your MBR now contains the Windows bootloader. Since you don't like my information, have a look here:

http://linux.ioerror.us/2006/01/30/w...-install-grub/

"If you intend to dual-boot Windows, then you should avoid installing GRUB to the MBR. The reason for this is that Windows occasionally overwrites the MBR, for instance, when you reinstall it, and that could be quite often. When that happens, your Linux system will seem to disappear as your system starts booting directly into Windows, bypassing the boot menu altogether. To avoid this, install GRUB to the boot sector of the active partition instead."


The active partition is the one marked with the boot flag. You can use cfdisk "b" command to set this.

Last edited by smallpond; 12-10-2011 at 02:45 PM. Reason: Add cfdisk info
 
Old 12-10-2011, 03:06 PM   #9
impert
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 282

Rep: Reputation: 54
Have you checked that the UUID's correspond to the devices? Some installers re-format swap, for instance, and change the UUID in the process. And maybe you should check them in grub.cfg also. Also make sure you have ro in the kernel line, or linux line, since it's grub2.
 
Old 12-14-2011, 02:37 PM   #10
Drone4four
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Manjaro
Posts: 205

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
After bashing my head against the wall for several days and after troubleshooting on 3 different forums and also in ##linux on FreeNode, the only solution was to reinstall Lisa. Ugh.

The experts in ##Linux hypothesized that my problem could have been ReiserFS related, so I went with ext4 upon reinstall. No problems so far.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual boot Ubuntu and Win 7. No root file system is defined error Retribution Linux - Newbie 7 10-12-2011 10:13 PM
[SOLVED] Dual boot Ubuntu and Win 7. No root file system is defined error Tomorrows_Gone Linux - Newbie 3 05-08-2011 11:07 PM
Mounting windows share via cifs (fstab entry) - error 13 opening credentials file O(V)eGA_l2el) Linux - Networking 2 12-05-2006 11:22 AM
System hangs on boot - "Mounting root file system" fails with Via VT6410 enabled Eagleorn Linux - Hardware 3 09-21-2006 12:58 PM
Boot Error: Root file system /dev/root adtomar Linux - Networking 0 12-27-2004 10:50 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration