Linux Foundation spends just 3.4% of its money on Linux
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Linux Foundation spends just 3.4% of its money on Linux
Bryan Lunduke went through the document which the Linux Foundation has tried to pass off as a financial report and noticed that the Linux Foundation spends just 3.4% of its money on Linux. So 96.6% is a mixture of overhead and wasteful activities, mostly the latter. However apparently no details were given about either, no details at all and Bryan does not link to the report. However, he's been accurate enough in the past so it is likely he is spot on with this.
If a larger percentage of that $177 million USD budget went to actual Linux, a lot of old code could be removed or refactored, in addition to a lot of other improvements. A mentioned, the Linux Foundation exists to represent its members' interests within the kernel. The warning was not heeded when the community representation was eliminated. It's not too late for Linus to do what he did with the OSDL and take his trademarks and walk, but it might be too late soon.
Bryan Lunduke went through the document which the Linux Foundation has tried to pass off as a financial report
It's an annual report, which is basically marketing to shareholders, no? Is there somewhere the Linux Foundation specifically referred to it as a financial report?
As ondoho notes, the 3.4% (~6 million USD) is referring to the kernel alone, whilst page 24 of the report refers to "Over 750 Open Source Project Communities" now being supported by the Linux Foundation.
I'm sure there's plenty of fluff/folly projects in that count, and it would certainly be nice to see a comprehensive list of the projects*, but referring to the entire non-Kernel budget as wasteful seems disingenuous.
*(may be available; I haven't looked yet and need to go eat now)
Ok, so the projects are available at https://www.linuxfoundation.org/projects/ but it's not a good list - just logos and titles linked to a URL - and to get them all requires pressing "view more" a number of times.
After doing that, I ran the the following to produce the attached text file.
Code:
var projects = [];
document.querySelectorAll('#listData .project-card a').forEach
(function(elem){
var title = elem.querySelector('span').innerText;
var url = elem.attributes.href.value;
projects.push(title+'\t'+url);
})
console.log(projects.join('\n'));
There are 601 projects in the resulting list, which is not "over 750" as the report claimed, and there are many duplicates entries - the real count may be closer to 500. (GraphQL appears as nine distinct rows).
I have only quickly scanned the list, but one jumped out at me: Why is Google's AMP being supported by the Linux Foundation!?
How is that in any way related to even the broadest definition of "Linux"?
I have only quickly scanned the list, but one jumped out at me: Why is Google's AMP being supported by the Linux Foundation!?
I bet there's more less obvious but equally inappropriate projects in there.
To most of us it's probably old news that the Linux foundation is not primarily about supporting actual Linux (kernel or OS), but about making sure that projects that depend on it continue to strive.
He's not wrong pointing this out, but I just hate Lunduke's sensationalist hyperbole. Always did.
Yes you should keep a careful watch on any Foundation that you choose to contribute to. But I think that it’s misleading to isolate what they are spending on the kernel, which is arguably the smallest part of the system. Linux as we refer to it is a very vast system of software components which “run under” the auspices of the kernel … and which might also run under other environments. Windows, MacOS (Mach), even mainframes and mobiles. The kernel is a very small thing that doesn’t change much.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.