LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2005, 06:17 AM   #16
luqman
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15

thankx harken but what about the second query???
 
Old 03-04-2005, 06:41 AM   #17
harken
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Between the chair and the desk
Distribution: Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.13
Posts: 666

Rep: Reputation: 30
Like I told you before, I'm not familiarized with rpms but, yes, the name has nothing to do with the kernel version itself. You can name it whatever you want as long as you go through all the compile & install steps as you should and you point the bootloader to the right file.
I think basically what you want should work but look again what abysko00 said:
Quote:
In SUSE for example you need to delete the old kernel entry from the rpm database, so that the new kernel does not overwrite it.
I don't want to mislead you in any way so for rpms you'd better post in the RedHat forum.
 
Old 03-04-2005, 07:25 AM   #18
abisko00
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Munich
Distribution: SuSE, Ubuntu
Posts: 3,513

Rep: Reputation: 58
Concerning your question if the sources of 2.4.25 fit to the kernel 2.4.25-something:

Yes and no! The number behind the dash is the EXTRAVERSION of your kernel, as defined in the Makefile. This is used to distinguish between kernels from the same source but with maybe different configuration or patches. In the later case you need to be careful, since a patch modifies the source.

Again, I can only provide an example from SUSE and must, just like harken, direct you to a RedHat forum: in SuSE, the version of the kernel binary has to fit exactly the version of the sources, in case you want to compile driver for example. This is because SUSE patched the kernel and gave it a new extraversion.
 
Old 03-04-2005, 07:33 AM   #19
luqman
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thankx a lot abisko00 and harken

Hopefully it will be sorted at the redhat
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kernel compilation : to remove a kernel which files should be deleted b0nd Linux - Newbie 2 08-17-2005 11:35 AM
Kernel compilation problems, distorted video and kernel panic shamrock_uk Linux - Laptop and Netbook 5 08-12-2005 10:53 PM
apt-get kernel-source is installing the wrong kernel source. JordanH Ubuntu 10 07-08-2005 05:42 PM
urpmi installs wrong kernel-source edgjerp Mandriva 4 02-14-2005 03:40 PM
aic79xx kernel panic on installtion rh 7.2 marl Linux - General 0 08-01-2003 07:36 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration