LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-09-2021, 07:57 AM   #1
igadoter
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: wroclaw, poland
Distribution: many, primary Slackware
Posts: 2,717
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625
Does 5.10 is secure?


I just found how many commits made Huawei into kernel source. This article makes me laugh https://news.itsfoss.com/huawei-kernel-contribution/ here I read
Quote:
Of course, this is a good reputation for the employers and also says a lot about the companies putting strong effort for Linux Kernel development, which is always a good thing.
but several paragraphs later
Quote:
Due to its close ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), suspicious activities and espionage accusations, Huawei has turned pariah in the tech world today.

I am just paranoic about 5.10 kernel and it seems I try to justify my paranoia. Nonetheless it is good to know. Next step will be to allow commits from CIA, NSA, all kind of Russian secret services
 
Old 03-09-2021, 08:20 AM   #2
Jan K.
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2019
Location: Esbjerg
Distribution: Windows 7...
Posts: 773

Rep: Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489
So... you're saying "bad things" have been placed inside kernel? Like... what?

Something the maintainers let pass?



Any chinese company is owned by chinese government.
 
Old 03-09-2021, 08:20 AM   #3
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,588
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455
I wouldn't trust Huawei further than I could throw them. But given the way that code is scrutinised and chewed over by the kernel hackers, I doubt if they could smuggle in any really bad stuff.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-09-2021, 08:22 AM   #4
jsbjsb001
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Earth, unfortunately...
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881

Rep: Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063Reputation: 2063
Well, it's not as if it's hard to find what Huawei has "contributed" to the kernel, and it's not like Windows where the average joe can't see what's there and who's "contributed it".

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux...=200&showmsg=1

It's also not a good idea to be on the bad side of the CCP if you're a Chinese company, even if you're a billionaire. Ask Jack Ma, oh that's right, where is he?
 
Old 03-09-2021, 11:58 AM   #5
DavidMcCann
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Debian
Posts: 6,142

Rep: Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314
And you notice that all the contributions made by Huawei seem to have been checked by a member of the kernel team. Personally, I'd trust Huawei over Google and Oracle any day.
 
Old 03-09-2021, 01:16 PM   #6
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS,Manjaro
Posts: 5,640

Rep: Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697
If, however, you are really worried you might look into using the BSD kernel and THAT security.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-12-2021, 03:20 AM   #7
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,456
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560Reputation: 2560
Quote:
Originally Posted by igadoter View Post
I am just paranoic about 5.10 kernel and it seems I try to justify my paranoia. Nonetheless it is good to know. Next step will be to allow commits from CIA, NSA, all kind of Russian secret services
Your fears are unfounded. You have access to the source code. You can chop out the parts you don't want, or simply leave them out of your kernel.
 
Old 03-12-2021, 07:53 AM   #8
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,879

Rep: Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316Reputation: 7316
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann View Post
Personally, I'd trust Huawei over Google and Oracle any day.
hm. I'm not really sure about that.
 
Old 03-12-2021, 08:32 AM   #9
igadoter
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: wroclaw, poland
Distribution: many, primary Slackware
Posts: 2,717

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625Reputation: 625
I was thinking little. Huawei also manufactures devices. I think that combination kernel on Huawei device can be compromised. Smartfone - on top is Android in the middle Linux kernel + patches needed device to work. All equipment provided for 5g network. Point here is that people trust Linux. So if device runs Linux - it can be trusted. And it can be very difficult to find connections between device provider and Huawei.
 
Old 03-12-2021, 08:36 AM   #10
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,588
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455
Well, that's the firmware, isn't it! It's an old grouse and not only on phones. Computers nowadays come with so many "engines" that the users have no control over whatever. The Linux kernel sits on top of all that and who knows if it is being given correct information, or if its instructions to the hardware are actually executed as intended?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VSFTPD with secure & non-secure logins Ricci Graham Linux - Software 6 02-24-2020 11:49 PM
How does AntiX handle Secure Boot that makes it work where Debian's Secure Boot fails? Ulysses_ antiX / MX Linux 6 02-17-2020 08:45 AM
LXer: University of Michigan Selects SSH Tectia for Secure System Administration and Secure File Transfers LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-25-2006 12:54 AM
Secure email (SSL vs. secure authentication) jrdioko Linux - Newbie 2 11-28-2004 01:39 PM
vsftpd very very secure, so secure i can't use it... baronsam Linux - Networking 4 10-06-2003 06:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration