LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games
User Name
Password
Linux - Games This forum is for all discussion relating to gaming in Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2005, 12:02 PM   #1
reetep
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 122

Rep: Reputation: 15
ut2004 install in a dual-boot friendly way


Hi there.

I'd like to install ut2004 to play on both windows and linux. I don't quite fancy having two installations of several GB each. Is there a way of installing it so that some of the files are shared?

Thanks, reetep.
 
Old 06-12-2005, 02:42 PM   #2
MikeZila
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 377

Rep: Reputation: 30
Yeah, you could in theory. I've never tried something like this, though.

What filesystems do you use for you Linux and Windows? ReiserFS? NTFS? ext2/3?
 
Old 06-12-2005, 04:52 PM   #3
lowpingnoob
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, soon DSL (DSL backwards is LSD hahahaha)
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeZila
Yeah, you could in theory. I've never tried something like this, though.

What filesystems do you use for you Linux and Windows? ReiserFS? NTFS? ext2/3?
Wait... but doesn't windows use Direct X, and the Linux version of UT2K4 use OpenGL... I thought the files would change... or would they?
 
Old 06-12-2005, 05:27 PM   #4
MikeZila
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 377

Rep: Reputation: 30
They both use the same maps, textures, and sounds, though.

You would have to have your windows install in a place that you could make symlinks to in place of where the files would be in your linux install.

Although this sollution is really crude. There are bound to be problems, most likely making the whole mess unplayable. It's a nice idea, but I don't think you should try it.
 
Old 06-12-2005, 09:16 PM   #5
lowpingnoob
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, soon DSL (DSL backwards is LSD hahahaha)
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeZila
They both use the same maps, textures, and sounds, though.

You would have to have your windows install in a place that you could make symlinks to in place of where the files would be in your linux install.

Although this sollution is really crude. There are bound to be problems, most likely making the whole mess unplayable. It's a nice idea, but I don't think you should try it.
Too. Much. Work. Easier to install twice, or just switch to linux completely! You would probably have to make copies of so many files (direct x only and open gl only) that it would take up 75% or so of two installs anyway. Just not worth it. But a good idea. The result would be a mess of bloated unplayable badness (and i mean bad in a bad way). Install it on one OS, I don't see the problem (only takes 2 min or so to switch os). Or use vmware (NOT reccomended (by me) for games).
 
Old 06-14-2005, 08:17 AM   #6
reetep
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 122

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for your help guys. The obvious thing worked - I just installed separately twice, giving the installer the same destination directory on a shared FAT32 partition each time.

I noticed it replaced existing files without prompting during the second install, so I had to hope that some of the critical files (ie the ones that differed between the two installation types) didn't share the same filename.

Looks like the makers thought of this, cos I haven't had any problems so far!

Thanks for your help. Hopefully this'll help anyone else out there wanting to do the same thing.

In case it makes a difference, I installed on linux first, but I really doubt that matters.
 
Old 06-14-2005, 09:45 AM   #7
lowpingnoob
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, soon DSL (DSL backwards is LSD hahahaha)
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by reetep
Thanks for your help guys. The obvious thing worked - I just installed separately twice, giving the installer the same destination directory on a shared FAT32 partition each time.

I noticed it replaced existing files without prompting during the second install, so I had to hope that some of the critical files (ie the ones that differed between the two installation types) didn't share the same filename.

Looks like the makers thought of this, cos I haven't had any problems so far!

Thanks for your help. Hopefully this'll help anyone else out there wanting to do the same thing.

In case it makes a difference, I installed on linux first, but I really doubt that matters.
Woah cool, but I never share partitions.... bad Feng-Shui. Oh and just a question : why did you want it on both OSes in the first place?
 
Old 06-14-2005, 11:29 AM   #8
reetep
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 122

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Woah cool, but I never share partitions.... bad Feng-Shui.
Whyever not? Do you not have music/films/documents that you want to be able to read/modify under either OS? What if you want to finish an essay that you started under windows when you happen to be under linux; do you reboot? I have a dedicated FAT32 partition for this purpose containing all my media, photos, documents etc. With the advent of NTFS write support for linux this won't be necessary of course, but I aint holding my breath...

Quote:
Oh and just a question : why did you want it on both OSes in the first place?
Why not? Especially if it doesn't take up any more room. It's also interesting to compare the performance under each OS - openGL versus DirectX etc.

In fact the main reason is because I don't have to reboot if I happen to be in one OS and want to play the game installed in the other. For example I feel uneasy using internet banking under windows - you never know whether there's a new unknown virus which incorporates keylogging software etc* - so I tend to do that under linux. Similarly the thought of using emacs under windows makes me shudder, and there's plenty of other things that I prefer to do under linux too. On the other hand there are some programs/games which won't run under linux. If I want to move from one game to the next I don't fancy rebooting.


*that's not to say that it might not happen under linux either, but certainly less likely, if only by virtue of the the fact that linux is a less popular OS.
 
Old 06-14-2005, 12:09 PM   #9
lowpingnoob
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, soon DSL (DSL backwards is LSD hahahaha)
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by reetep
Whyever not? Do you not have music/films/documents that you want to be able to read/modify under either OS? What if you want to finish an essay that you started under windows when you happen to be under linux; do you reboot? I have a dedicated FAT32 partition for this purpose containing all my media, photos, documents etc. With the advent of NTFS write support for linux this won't be necessary of course, but I aint holding my breath...



Why not? Especially if it doesn't take up any more room. It's also interesting to compare the performance under each OS - openGL versus DirectX etc.

In fact the main reason is because I don't have to reboot if I happen to be in one OS and want to play the game installed in the other. For example I feel uneasy using internet banking under windows - you never know whether there's a new unknown virus which incorporates keylogging software etc* - so I tend to do that under linux. Similarly the thought of using emacs under windows makes me shudder, and there's plenty of other things that I prefer to do under linux too. On the other hand there are some programs/games which won't run under linux. If I want to move from one game to the next I don't fancy rebooting.


*that's not to say that it might not happen under linux either, but certainly less likely, if only by virtue of the the fact that linux is a less popular OS.
ah that make sense, but still, sharing a partition makes me uneasy, so I dont. Linux is my only OS now.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to install dual-boot vegetassj2 Linux - Software 4 10-18-2005 10:51 AM
Mepis-friendly linux distros for dual-boot dealerman MEPIS 12 07-13-2005 09:27 PM
i cant get my redhat to boot on new install and no dual boot ssbullpit Red Hat 2 03-16-2004 08:39 PM
dual boot install help wass29 Slackware 4 03-10-2003 09:48 PM
Win2K/RH7.1 Dual, RH won't boot from boot disk after install marktaff Linux - Software 4 08-24-2001 05:29 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration