Please share your experiences with "open source" storage
Linux - EnterpriseThis forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Please share your experiences with "open source" storage
For those willing to share details, I'd be very interested to read about your experiences (successes, failures, and opinions about production-worthiness) with "open source" storage. What I mean by "open source" storage in this context is a mature software implementation of high-availability, reliable block level (with cluster awareness) or NAS storage that can run on commodity servers.
Especially interested in your experiences with either GlusterFS or Lustre.
I've tried OpenFiler in the past and didn't have any major issues, but if you're interested in glusterfs you may have noticed the recent release of Red Hat Storage 2.0, it's probably a little more enterprise ready now.
Thanks for the OpenFiler lead. May I ask how you were using it (as SAN or NAS device?), and approximately what level of volume you were reading/writing to it?
We used them as NAS backing for a dev VMware ESX cluster, we didn't have any budget for storage so recycling a couple of servers was the work around. They ran pretty well considering, they were stock standard 2u's with 6x146GB U320's. Again from memory, I think we had roughly 50 vm's but I can't remember any of the i/o figures.
Hi
Using since ~2 years GlusterFS to share directories in a NFS-like way. Very happy with it.
Be aware that I really only use the server/client architecture of GlusterFS to make the stuff available to other hosts - I still use a normal software-raid to manage the HDDs, distribute the data, etc... .
Wrote this to describe how I set up things.
Yes, just a home project.
To use it in a company I would probably first drop an email to the people that are working on it to ask what their plans for the future are - I think that there were a lot of changes to GlusterFS during the last years and it would be good to clarify what the future plans are and how the acquisition by RedHat will influence them.
Last edited by unSpawn; 09-07-2012 at 01:57 PM.
Reason: //Prune 'n graft threadid=4175426154
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.