LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Password
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2012, 03:09 PM   #1
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Please share your experiences with "open source" storage


For those willing to share details, I'd be very interested to read about your experiences (successes, failures, and opinions about production-worthiness) with "open source" storage. What I mean by "open source" storage in this context is a mature software implementation of high-availability, reliable block level (with cluster awareness) or NAS storage that can run on commodity servers.

Especially interested in your experiences with either GlusterFS or Lustre.

Thanks for your time.
 
Old 06-28-2012, 03:35 PM   #2
kbp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,790

Rep: Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653
I've tried OpenFiler in the past and didn't have any major issues, but if you're interested in glusterfs you may have noticed the recent release of Red Hat Storage 2.0, it's probably a little more enterprise ready now.
 
Old 06-28-2012, 04:02 PM   #3
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks for the OpenFiler lead. May I ask how you were using it (as SAN or NAS device?), and approximately what level of volume you were reading/writing to it?
 
Old 06-28-2012, 04:42 PM   #4
kbp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,790

Rep: Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653
We used them as NAS backing for a dev VMware ESX cluster, we didn't have any budget for storage so recycling a couple of servers was the work around. They ran pretty well considering, they were stock standard 2u's with 6x146GB U320's. Again from memory, I think we had roughly 50 vm's but I can't remember any of the i/o figures.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-19-2012, 07:45 AM   #5
Pearlseattle
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 999

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
Hi
Using since ~2 years GlusterFS to share directories in a NFS-like way. Very happy with it.
Be aware that I really only use the server/client architecture of GlusterFS to make the stuff available to other hosts - I still use a normal software-raid to manage the HDDs, distribute the data, etc... .
Wrote this to describe how I set up things.

Cheers
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-19-2012, 11:22 AM   #6
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks for the note. (Looks like your GlusterFS deployment is a home project, right?)
 
Old 07-19-2012, 02:21 PM   #7
Pearlseattle
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 999

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
Yes, just a home project.
To use it in a company I would probably first drop an email to the people that are working on it to ask what their plans for the future are - I think that there were a lot of changes to GlusterFS during the last years and it would be good to clarify what the future plans are and how the acquisition by RedHat will influence them.

Last edited by unSpawn; 09-07-2012 at 01:57 PM. Reason: //Prune 'n graft threadid=4175426154
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please share "A Heavily Commented Linux Kernel Source Code" English version osdevkid Linux - Kernel 3 03-04-2011 12:02 AM
LXer: Why "open source" is not "free software" LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-11-2009 06:10 PM
Standard commands give "-bash: open: command not found" even in "su -" and "su root" mibo12 Linux - General 4 11-11-2007 10:18 PM
LXer: Merging "Open Source" and "Free Software" LXer Syndicated Linux News 2 08-08-2007 04:27 AM
Can you explain the difference between "Free Software (GNU)" and "Open Source"? vharishankar General 5 03-03-2005 09:40 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration