LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Password
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2010, 09:13 AM   #1
ToastyOhs
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Does this exist?


Hello.

I work for a medium sized hospital with several remote locations. We are currently running various windows based servers.

The trouble is that our users are requiring more and more space for data and email archive storage. Administration does not want to use quotas, (as they are our biggest offenders). This is getting expensive and we are looking for solutions.

Is there software out there that will allow us to manage a file server in such a way that newer data is readily accessible to users, but older data can be stored on a separate NAS device, possibly compressed? Of course, this will need to be transparent to the end users. Soft links?

Thank you

-Patrick
 
Old 07-07-2010, 10:08 AM   #2
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,349

Rep: Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331
Throw in a few more details. Exactly hos can we discriminate between 'new' & 'old'?

If New & old can be determined, e.g. by file type, a VB script might do it. Otherwise just dump administration on the network server. It's not vital medical data.
 
Old 07-07-2010, 10:18 AM   #3
ToastyOhs
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
What we had in mind was to take files that had not been accessed or modified in the past say, 6 months, and move them from the file server to another storage device. The idea being that if they have not needed them, we could tuck them away on a device with bigger slower hard drives.

We could do this manually with robocopy, but it would mean that our users would have to look in two locations for their files, and that would never fly.

Symantec Enterprise Vault is supposed to do something like this, but it is not an option at this point in our fiscal cycle.
 
Old 07-07-2010, 10:37 AM   #4
custangro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: California
Distribution: Fedora , CentOS , RHEL
Posts: 1,979
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 209Reputation: 209Reputation: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToastyOhs View Post
What we had in mind was to take files that had not been accessed or modified in the past say, 6 months, and move them from the file server to another storage device. The idea being that if they have not needed them, we could tuck them away on a device with bigger slower hard drives.

We could do this manually with robocopy, but it would mean that our users would have to look in two locations for their files, and that would never fly.

Symantec Enterprise Vault is supposed to do something like this, but it is not an option at this point in our fiscal cycle.
I know this will probably won't help...BUT...

We switched to Google Apps here; and it's been nothing but smooth sailing...

Google Docs, Calendar, Email, Chat, and 7 years of archiving for about $80 per user per year. Completely hosted solution...

Price comparison was this...

We were going to upgrade to Exchange 2010...including servers/licensing it was about $300K for it...

For Google Apps it was $20,000

Assuming it's a 5 year solution...

Exchange 2010 is still $300K
Google is $20,000x5 which is $100,000

Still cheaper

Just a thought...maybe a hosted solution would be better (dosen't have to be Google...just sharing our experience)?

-C
 
Old 07-07-2010, 10:52 AM   #5
ToastyOhs
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
It would be nice to switch to google apps or Open Office and not have to pay Microsoft Office licensing costs, but that has been tried in the past before I started here. They did not have enough support from higher administration at the time to have all users make the switch, (accounting in particular has/had tons of access databases they were not willing to convert) so it is now rejected out of hand.

Of of the things that I have learned working at a hospital is that everything is vital medical data. Apparently the Feds also require extensive backups to be available on request.
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:55 PM   #6
ToastyOhs
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
1. Locate old data > 6 months old

2. Create a transparent link

3. Move old data - keep folder structure

4. Compress old data (optional)

5. Work with our current shares and security groups
 
Old 07-08-2010, 03:22 AM   #7
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,349

Rep: Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331Reputation: 2331
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToastyOhs View Post
1. Locate old data > 6 months old
2. Create a transparent link
3. Move old data - keep folder structure
4. Compress old data (optional)
5. Work with our current shares and security groups
This is a linux forum, and linux solutions would be to read the man pages for find, xargs, etc. I'm nervous about shortcuts or symlinks on windows systems. Can you handle that end?. Then it seems you need (excuse syntax)

for dirs in i ; do
mkdir -p /some/where/else/far/away/$i && chmod appropriately
find -path $i -date [options] |xargs zip - && mv /some/else/far/away/$i
next i

If you run that, results are pretty unpredictable until you tidy it but you get the drift. Then simply email folks and tell them their old files are in their backup directory. And move _all_ of admin's stuff to the backup - it sounds like they need a reminder not to throw weight around ).
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does this exist! ScotHypnotist Linux - Newbie 16 01-19-2008 04:02 AM
Does this exist? Morbid SUSE / openSUSE 38 07-22-2006 08:16 PM
Does this exist? oneandoneis2 Linux - General 3 01-26-2005 05:46 PM
Does this exist? WorldBuilder General 3 08-20-2003 09:28 PM
You don't exist. Go away! cruella Linux - General 41 12-07-2002 10:30 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration