Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Seconding Slackware. Especially for Linux software and graphical/desktop environment exploration if you do the recommended full install.
Even if you, at some point in the future, when you're more in touch with Linux, find that Slackware out of the box doesn't deliver all the software you need, and you really find the lack of dependency resolution of the package manager simply unacceptable (even though it's super easy, or I wouldn't use Slackware), then you'll at least have gotten your feet wet with one of the more sensible and stable distros otherwise.
It's easy to explore Linux that way, in my opinion. It's very stable and the full install comes with redundancies, which perhaps sounds offputting, but you get several text editors, IDEs, media players, graphics editors and painting apps, office tools, etc all configured sensibly and working.
That way you get a head start in your choices, without having to immediately ask for even barebones recommendations for the various fields.
I tried Geany. I tried Kate. I tried nano. I tried vim and stuck with that one in the end.
I wouldn't have known about Krita if it hadn't been in Slackware until I don't even know when.
I wouldn't have known about neato stuff like "soma", a terminal music/radio player, which kept me entertained while I messed around with terminal stuff (since Slackware was my first actual serious distro foray).
I played killbots. I made some jigsaw puzzles out of some of my pictures with palapeli. I had fun with kstars, etc, and the internet worked for me too.
My actual first tries with Linux were years earlier and I was confused with PPP and whatnot, but Slackware just worked for me.
So, yeah, if I didn't stick with Slackware after doing all that, I'd still would have gotten the knowledge about software and system management I gained from it.
I did, though. I haven't used anything else for my own installations since.
and what DE to use in you distro
DE:
1) blow of mind -- KDE, Gnome3
2) standard -- xfce, Mate, lxde, lxqt, icewm, windowMaker
3) modern - Cinnamon, Deepin
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.