Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just switched from the 32 bit version of suse 9.1 to the 64, and I can't notice a difference in application load times, web browsing, or anything else. I tried mandrake 9.1 or 9.2, in both versions as well a while ago, and there was definitely a noticeable difference. I heard someplace that it might be that I don't have enough RAM (512MB) and I will work on that as soon as my scholarships are renewed. What kind of PC test programs are out there for linux?
Here's my hardware:
AMD 64 3200+
Via KV8T800
512 MB PC 3200
GeForce FX 5700
How does this AMD 64 chip works? Maybe it's one of those that's got 64 extensions, but can work with 32 bit progs?
Maybe suse was already giving you the boosted performance while in 32 bit version. I would be surprised if your kernel didn't detect the 64 feature.
Err.. . .the kernel can't just detect the 'feature'. . . we are talking 64 bit address registers here. To use them you need to compile a program for it. Simple as that.
SuSE 9.1 Pro 32bit is compiled just for 32bit address registers, that's how it can work on a P2 or P3 (or any other 32bit address register based CPUs) . . .
SuSE 9.1 Pro 64bit will run way faster on a AMD64 based system, because it is not compiled to work with older hardware.
Wow, after a question like that. . . I have to say, you should really not talk about what you don't know.
The x86_64 chips from AMD (aka AMD64, or Athlon64) are backwards compatible with 32 bit code.
They are still great preformers when dealing with just 32 bit code, I mean they rock intel's offerings in some benchmarks. But, to be using every aspect of your new 64 bit chip, you need 64 bit code.
Can anyone suggest a good way for me to quantitatively compare performance in both versions so that I will know I am not just being pessimistic, and are there any opinions on the RAM?
my mistake and I apologize...what I meant was how do you install 32 bit programs without the Unknown CPU architecture error...do I have to compile everything from source?...and mozilla does actually seem quite a bit faster...I was using konqueror before.
...maybe compiling the same large program in each OS and timing it would be a good way to compare performance?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.