LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2007, 09:00 AM   #1
the gladiator
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Slim but scalable distro


I’m looking for a distro with a very small (or even better none at all) set of packages bundled with the starting distro install but with a large (possibly huge) repository of packages; I would then select and install ONLY what I need.

Due to the limited number of packages I’m not considering distro such as DSL, Puppy, etc; for the same reason I have excluded (unfortunately) Slackware based distros (Nimblex would be perfect).

I’m rather focusing on stripped down distro such MCNLive and PCLinuxOS Minime (although the latter is based on a very old version of PCLinuxOS) and on distros that provide “networking install” such as Debian and Yoper.

Are you aware of something else belonging of these two categories ? Any other idea to meet my goal ?

NB I believe it's clear but I would like to stress the fact that I'm NOT looking for a distro for an old laptop
 
Old 10-11-2007, 09:07 AM   #2
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
How small do you want the footprint to be?

My suggestion would be to set yourself up with a Debian net-install CD, but that's a biased opinion.
 
Old 10-12-2007, 02:42 AM   #3
the gladiator
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Indienick, thanks for your answer,

The footprint should be as small as possible and I agree with your…biased suggestion: I’ll probably give it a try. The only fear I have is that I’d like to start with no applications but with a full system support (wireless support, etc.): will I be able to add the correct modules making the selection only on their name ?
 
Old 10-12-2007, 05:16 PM   #4
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
Absolutely.

What Debian does when it installs X, is it installs not only the xserver, but also ALL of the available drivers. What you may find yourself doing once in a while, is installing one meta-package and then uninstalling a whole bunch of packages that you know you don't need (but were installed by the meta-package).

It is a slight pain, yes, but the only packages I know of that do it, that I have come across, are "gnome" "kde" "xfce4" and "xserver-xorg".
 
Old 10-12-2007, 07:44 PM   #5
Hern_28
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 12.0, Gentoo, LFS, Debian, Kubuntu.
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 38
One More.

Might consider gentoo. Might want to do a bit of reading if you are not familiar with linux though. Build it as small as you want or use portage to manage your packages.
 
Old 10-13-2007, 04:17 AM   #6
jacook
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Townsville, Australia
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .93 Junior
Posts: 437

Rep: Reputation: 30
BeaFanatIX
http://bea.cabarel.com/

PCFluxBoxOS
http://sourceforge.net/project/showf...ease_id=538615

Luit Linux
http://luitlinux.sarovar.org/
 
Old 10-15-2007, 06:02 AM   #7
FredGSanford
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Mageia 7 - Debian 10 - Artix Linux
Posts: 1,142
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 207Reputation: 207Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by indienick View Post
How small do you want the footprint to be?

My suggestion would be to set yourself up with a Debian net-install CD, but that's a biased opinion.
I second Debian...once you have the base installed, just apt-get install whatuneed.
 
Old 10-23-2007, 02:15 AM   #8
the gladiator
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks to all for your useful suggestions.

Going deeper I have an additional question for the Debian supporters. Which face of Debian you recommend me: Etch, Lenny or Sid ? In the latter case why not Sidux ?
 
Old 10-24-2007, 02:31 PM   #9
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
Code:
Etch  = Current stable.
Lenny = Testing.
Sid   = Unstable.
The basic way this works is, the moment somebody creates a package for Debian and submits it, it goes into "unstable" status. After it's been there for a while, and no horrific problems still exist, it gets promoted to "testing". After several months in there, it will eventually move on to "stable".

You start out with Etch, but by editing your /etc/apt/sources.list file, you can change your system to Lenny or Sid status.

If you're running a server, STABLE STABLE STABLE. Even running a desktop, I won't commit to unstable; unstable is, IMHO, for tweak-freaks.
 
Old 10-27-2007, 04:49 PM   #10
mcmillan
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 489

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arch is another distro that would be worth looking into. It's base is real small but it makes it real easy to build whatever you want on top of it. I actually prefer Arch's package manager, pacman, over apt. I think the repositories aren't quite as big as debian's but there's hardly anything I've needed that wasn't available. And if you do find something that doesn't have an available package it's real easy to make your own packages.
 
Old 10-29-2007, 04:05 AM   #11
the gladiator
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks, Mcmillan, you're pointing me to the distro that is...#2 in my ranking! I'll give a try to that distro...after having tried Debian.
 
Old 11-05-2007, 04:51 PM   #12
Grife
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Distribution: openSUSE
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'd suggest Gentoo minimal install as well. It's about 100 megs and repositories are huge. You need considerade amount of patience and/or prior knowledge of linux however.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Scalable anonymity with I2P LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 02-05-2008 12:40 AM
Slim distro for old laptop needed HaPP Linux - Distributions 8 08-30-2007 01:32 PM
what is the Scalable numerical algorithms ztdep Linux - Software 1 01-15-2006 01:32 AM
Scalable Font Problem, Please Help Skywing Linux - General 4 03-09-2005 12:35 PM
XFree86 xfonts-scalable errors krazj73 Linux - Newbie 1 03-06-2004 12:49 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration