Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
About a decade ago, a friend introduced me to Linux and installed YellowDog Linux 2.1 on my then-aging PowerMac 6500/300.
The X-windows system ran frustratingly slowly in both KDE and GNOME, but especially KDE. It ran marginally faster in something he added called Windowmaker.
I wrote it off as the machine being too slow. However, recently I saw somebody running either Red Hat or Fendora on a 250mhz pentium II machine. I was able to run Firefox at a reasonable speed for the machine.Given that that former "wintel" machine had a 32-bit processor and the PPC 603ev is a 64-bit processor and is 50mhz faster, I'd assume I should have been getting comperable performance, but I don't. I'd like suggestions on what distributions I can use today besides Yellow Dog.
Back when YDL 2.3 and 3.0 came out, I had difficulty upgrading. mostly with the video not working right.
I realize that the old 6500/300 is hopelessly obsolete, and the only reason I keep it around is to use as a TV set and occasionally display text files downloaded from Gamefaqs.com.
I'd like to be able to use Linux to breathe new life into the machine and make it once again useful for basic web browsing as well like it was 5 years ago.
I may be asking a lot of the old machine by trying to use it for browsing the web today like I used to in the past, but if I'm going to keep it around, I'd like it to be as useful as possible.
So, what distributions will work on the old PowerMac 6500/300 with 128mb of RAM and a 20gb (ext2 partition, the rest are hfs+ partitions except for the 128mb swap) hard drive?
OldWorld Mac can use debian. You'll need to use a boot loader adapter- forgot which one- to load the system. Bootx, that's it.
You then have to find extra instructions on using this. I believe older gentoos allow such.
Here goes the catch, you then have to upgrade everything after you install. I'm not trying to discourage you, I'm letting you know there is work to be done. Be patient through this part.
There's a howto on debian forums.
I would also say use a netinst of Debian. I did it on an older G3 imac, I think a 300mhz with 128mb of ram. I used fluxbox as the window manager, ran pretty good. I still have the machine but hardly use it anymore.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.