Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Which distro makes SMB networking a breeze?
Red Hat (The Devil)
10
35.71%
Debian (The Notorious Hard One)
2
7.14%
SuSE (The Green Geeko [chameleon])
5
17.86%
Mandrake (The One Release Every 5 years one)
6
21.43%
Gentoo (Mr. Impossible)
1
3.57%
Knoppix (The Slick CD one)
0
0%
SlackWare (put on your slacks for the love of god)
I KNOW you CAN network Linux and Windows via Samba, but I am not having any luck with it.
I know that some distros come with their own tools and utilities. For example Mandrake comes with tools not available in SuSE (and vice versa). Also some distros have historically focused on making speicific usability areas better. For instance RedHat is viewed by many as a powerhouse, whereas Mandrake is "The freind" and so on...
My question is which distro makes it the easiest to succesfully set up a simple LAN network to share files between Linux and Windows in your experience?
I have provided a Poll with this topic. Please feel free to use it.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: The nicknames for each distro in the poll where meant to be humorous. NO OFFENSE to anyone or anyone's liking of a specific distro
Last edited by shassouneh; 04-04-2003 at 05:38 AM.
My question is which distro makes it the easiest to succesfully set up a simple LAN network to share files between Linux and Windows in your experience?
All the above although I haven't try any except Mandrake.
Below is what my smb.conf looks like.
Code:
#======================= Global Settings =====================================
[global]
workgroup = HOME
netbios name = ELIZA
server string = Mandrake LINUX 9 using SMB
large readwrite = yes
printcap name = lpstat
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
; security = user
security = share
guest only = yes
guest ok = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
dns proxy = no
client code page = 850
character set = ISO8859-1
#============================ Share Definitions ==============================
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes
create mode = 0700
print command = lpr-cups -P %p -o raw %s -r # using client side printer
drivers.
[print$]
path = /var/lib/samba/printers
browseable = yes
read only = yes
write list = @adm root
[pdf-generator]
path = /var/tmp
guest ok = No
printable = Yes
comment = PDF Generator (only valid users)
#print command = /usr/share/samba/scripts/print-pdf file path win_path
recipient IP &
print command = /usr/share/samba/scripts/print-pdf %s ~%u \\\\\\\\%L\\\\%u %m
%I &
[Video]
comment = Movie Clips
path = /mnt/D/Video
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = no
printable = no
[Public]
comment = Everybody can write
path = /mnt/D/Public
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
[My Documents]
comment = My Documents
path = "/mnt/D/My Documents"
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = no
printable = no
[Bookmarks]
comment = Bookmarks to Internet Sites
path = /mnt/D/internet/favorites
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
[Downloads]
comment = Downloads from Internet Sites
path = /mnt/D/Downloads
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = no
printable = no
[Applications]
comment = Full Version Applications
path = /mnt/D/appz
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = no
printable = no
[Linux]
comment = Linux Distributions & Programs
path = /mnt/D/Linux
public = yes
guest ok = yes
only guest = yes
writable = no
printable = no
My is setup makes guests see my shared files. I can setup user accounts to access my Linux system. All my shared files are read only except Public.
justlinux.com has some tutorials on how to setup SAMBA.
I'd like to know the answer to this question myself. I have had no luck in getting Linux to network with Windows. As a client I can see my server and other computer, I can even access the shares on my other box, cannot access or even see the shares on my server.
Linux as a server was a complete disaster. Nothing worked..dchp, dns, shares, routing, acting as a gateway... nothing. I know it was my lack of knowledge that was the root of the problems, but rather than spending countless hours reading and looking for those small details burried in hundreds of documents, I put .net server on and had my network up and running again within an hour.. except for Linux accessing the shares on it. I'm beginning to think it's a .net thing, that it won't let Linux get to the shared drives.
I'd still rather have Linux as my server, but not if I can't get it to work right.
i voted for redhat in your poll for the following reason: redhat 8.0 and a book called "redhat bible" helped me get samba up and running , for the first time, with reasonably decent security,good enough for my
home lan. i have weak eyes, i can read books easier than online docs. the book was not cheap, and i have since moved on to gentoo, but the point is the book was written so i could understand it , for me easy to read, and the suggested configuration options worked. i can still use the book as a reference for my gentoo.
redhat is not my favorite distro, but there is simply tons of good
stuff written specifically about using redhat .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.