Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey, I'd suggest arch linux if you want speed and ease of configuration, maybe with icewm which looks good with the silverxp theme and is very fast and also easy with iceme and icepref. There's even an ice configuration panel project where they try to make it very easy to configurate everything (like the windows configuration panel). I don't need any such panel because it's very easy to edit some textfiles to set everything up in arch, icewm.
You could also use Gnome or KDE on such a machine ofcourse. But icewm will be much faster. I'd suggest you try out gnome, kde, xfce, icewm, fluxbox, openbox, windowmaker, ratpoison, ... and so on. And see what you like.
If I were you I'd first try out Arch linux, then debian, vector linux, ...
Debian has an advantage because it has automatic made menus for the lighter wm's, and automatic mailcap creation, ... But arch is much cleaner in configuration files and faster (boots double as fast as debian here)
You see there's no real answer for you, just suggestions. And it's up to you to try it
As I am going to load up three PC's, was thinking of trying the following:
Slackware, Mepis and Arch.
I was also thinking of trying the new 'myah os' although i'm in two minds as I don't think it comes with a package manager, so might prove to be a little awkward for a newbie such as myself.
Still by installing three or more distro's on different computers should give me a good idea as to what I like and dislike. Then I can give feedback for other newbie's who might be interested in my experiences.
Distribution: SUSE 10.0, LiMP (Linux Multimedia Player)
Posts: 86
Rep:
Not that it necessarily would have crossed your mind to SUSE (?), but if anyone else ever reads this with the same problems,
it's robably not best to use SUSE on a Pentium III (still a bit sluggish).
If anyone was thinking of using Fedora, I found Fedora Core 4 to be much better on my old slow machine, if there don't happen to be any sound bugs for your hardware. I would have stuck with Fedora on my Pentium III had it not been for that. You might be ok though.
I have a 600MHz Celeron at home with 192 MB RAM and tried few distributions:
- Mandrake 10.0 - find it a bit slow
- SUSE 9.2 - looong booting time, the slowest of what I've tried
- Ubuntu - runs pretty good, maybe I'll put it back when I receive the Breezy CDs. The only problem is that I have analog dial-up connection, so I can't update that much from the web
- Damn Small - rooocks! :-) Nice to see it blasting.
- UHU Linux - that's what I use now. It's a hungarian distribution, based on Debian. Performance is similar to Ubuntu, I can comfortably use Gnome as window manager. And of course, XFCE4 is something really special - the swap file is allmost unused!
yeah, as long as you have that 512 of ram, you should be fine with anything.
My Irongate 800mHz has 256 ram has ran slack-current with fluxbox for the last 2 years or so, it still screams.
And my Pentuim MMX with 64 megs runs Freebsd with blackbox just fine, even use dillo for the web now and again haha
Originally posted by mipia
And my Pentuim MMX with 64 megs runs Freebsd with blackbox just fine, even use dillo for the web now and again haha
My pentium MMX with 64MB ram is running debian testing with the newest opera browser just fine. I barely notice the difference between my 2ghz and my 166mhz because of the light apps I use
(links2 -g is also a great browser )
Thanks for the info. I have tried downloading the .iso image from one of the mirror sites and it stops at 118mb, but the site states file size at 678mb.
I will try the site you recommend, if that doesnt work will try BitTorrent.
Would you say that the distro is easy to learn and provides everything a kid could want (with the exception of games).
Yeah Everything A kid could want, very Graphical nice setup and easy to learn, heck yes you could use it one handed, I know I do, I only Have the use of one hand, extra bonus for me
Anyway I'm sorry to hear that the Distro download isn't working for you, I could send you A copy if you want. I'll just need your postal Address and full name
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.