Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I recently installed Fedora 35 + KDE and I'm noticing some "artifacts" on the taskbar:
faint replicas of the icons. The "normal" icons appear at the right side of the taskbar
and the faint replicas appear at about the middle of the taskbar and also they're slightly
smaller compared with the "original" icons.
I've read the "display driver primer" you pointed to but I don't yet understand, where should Ilook to know what display
driver I use?
Also, my current display resolution is 1920x1200, from what I've read the "non-modesetting" variant is limited to lower resolutions,
can I deduce from it that currently I'm not using the "nomodesetting"? Also, the contents of /etc/default/grub doesn't include anyhing that looks like
"nomodesetting":
/var/log/Xorg.0.log is a report of what is occurring or not in last Xorg session. The display driver in use will be evident if you study it. An easier method is to run inxi -Ga, a concise report of X hardware and software configuration. A related command to report and control a running Xorg is xrandr.
As nomodeset is primarily designed for troubleshooting, it normally won't be evident anywhere in an X session working as expected, or in /etc/default/grub. I don't think it possible to achieve 1920x1200 absent KMS, and least, not with FOSS drivers for AMD, Intel or NVidia GPUs.
AS I understand, the driver is "radeon". BTW, how to understand both the line where it's listed as: "driver: X: loaded: radeon"
and the next line which lists among the unloaded: "gpu: radeon"? That the OS doesn't use the hardware accelerating features of the GPU?
And to the point of the original question: what knowing that the display driver is "radeon" can (or can't?) help regarding the
faint replicas of icons (actually, of anything else too) displayed on the taskbar?
BTW, how to understand both the line where it's listed as: "driver: X: loaded: radeon"
and the next line which lists among the unloaded: "gpu: radeon"? That the OS doesn't use the hardware accelerating features of the GPU?
I don't understand what you're asking here.
driver: radeon v: kernel alternate: amdgpu means the kernel driver in use is radeon, and there is a supported alternate driver (amdgpu).
driver: X: loaded: radeon means the X display driver in use is radeon.
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa means X was able to load 3 alternate display drivers, which were unloaded in favor of that remaining loaded.
The reason for the presence of gpu: radeon I don't know.
KDE/Plasma really isn't ready for use with Wayland. Wayand AFAIK isn't really ready for anything except possibly Gnome. Many things are possible in Xorg that are not supported by Wayland. Does the icon problem appear when you run Plasma in an Xorg session?
When one knows which driver is in use, one may know to suggest some other driver(s) to try. In your case, you could replace the radeon device driver with the amdgpu device driver, and at the same time you would replace the radeon display driver with either the amdgpu display driver or the modesetting display driver. The modesetting display driver can also be used with the radeon device driver. The modesetting is actually the default. Both amdgpu and radeon display drivers are optional.
So, to deal with the actual problem, there are two basic ways forward:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.