LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2013, 02:31 PM   #1
CHRwences
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Lightbulb Choosing the Right Linux Distribution


Hello all,
I have a CompaQ Presario SR5223WM computer and was wondering what would be a better distribution to use on it with a completely erased hard disk, no running system whatsoever. Thanks in advance.
 
Old 03-10-2013, 02:51 PM   #2
linuxpokernut
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware 14
Posts: 237
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 59
Something light. Peppermint perhaps. Whatever distro you use I would try and use fluxbox or a lightweight Window manager. Slackware would of course be my personal choice.

I have Peppermint on a Laptop with 2G ram and its even a bit slow with the included WM.

I would not use Fedora or Ubuntu, IMHO those would be too slow.

I see its your first post here, welcome! Is it also your first Linux install? I would almost certainly say Peppermint if it is. If you clue us in a little more on your level of experience, we can help a little more.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-10-2013, 02:53 PM   #3
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
There are quite a few good ones around....it all boils down to what makes you happy...there is a test you can take to see what suits best...

Some distros come to mind of course:

- macPup, light ard powerfull, does noet update, as far as I know
- Xubuntu, light, long term support, everything works out of the box
- Fedora, some stuff is broken, great OS but...you're a beta tester, check if your box can carry this load...
- Arch, you do everything yourself, for the more ... seasoned Linuxean be warned, the community can be a bit harsh...

Let us know which one was the "winner"
And, welcome here!!!

Thor

Last edited by ButterflyMelissa; 03-10-2013 at 02:54 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-10-2013, 03:04 PM   #4
CHRwences
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxpokernut View Post
Something light. Peppermint perhaps. Whatever distro you use I would try and use fluxbox or a lightweight Window manager. Slackware would of course be my personal choice.

I have Peppermint on a Laptop with 2G ram and its even a bit slow with the included WM.

I would not use Fedora or Ubuntu, IMHO those would be too slow.

I see its your first post here, welcome! Is it also your first Linux install? I would almost certainly say Peppermint if it is. If you clue us in a little more on your level of experience, we can help a little more.

Thanks! Well ive installed Fedora and indeed it was too slow also some applications wouldnt work properly, so then i installed Ubuntu which loaded quickly, recognised all my drivers but also was slow. I think i will give Slackware a try.. experience wise im not too great but i am trying to become proficient in using Linux softwares so Thanks for your feedback.
 
Old 03-10-2013, 03:05 PM   #5
CHRwences
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor_2.0 View Post
There are quite a few good ones around....it all boils down to what makes you happy...there is a test you can take to see what suits best...

Some distros come to mind of course:

- macPup, light ard powerfull, does noet update, as far as I know
- Xubuntu, light, long term support, everything works out of the box
- Fedora, some stuff is broken, great OS but...you're a beta tester, check if your box can carry this load...
- Arch, you do everything yourself, for the more ... seasoned Linuxean be warned, the community can be a bit harsh...

Let us know which one was the "winner"
And, welcome here!!!

Thor
Macpup sounds interesting, maybe will give it a try also. Do you have a url to that test ?
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:59 PM   #6
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
On a machine like that I woulod give Debian or Fuduntu a try.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-10-2013, 08:56 PM   #7
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Manjaro
Posts: 1,791

Rep: Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427
If you're going with Fedora, Debian, or one of their derivatives, I recommend checking out the LXDE desktop version.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-12-2013, 03:43 AM   #8
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
@ RockDoctor

Quote:
Do you have a url to that test ?
The CD should spin up and act as a Live CD until you install. Be watrned, MacPup needs some extra care to get installed, but on the upside, it basically detects anything on the box...some caution: if you stand too close it may even detect your shoe size...

Thor
 
Old 03-12-2013, 07:39 AM   #9
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Manjaro
Posts: 1,791

Rep: Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427
I recall seeing a distro chooser a couple of years ago - not sure which website had it. This was not it. This wasn't it either, but it looks interesting.
 
Old 03-12-2013, 01:28 PM   #10
DavidMcCann
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Debian
Posts: 6,142

Rep: Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314
I don't think you need to look for a lightweight distro. The specs are Sempron 3600, 1GB RAM, NVIDIA video. This computer has a Sempron 2600, 1GB, and motherboard graphics. I wouldn't run the KDE desktop with all the bells and whistles, but it's fine with anything else.

I'd try a few live disks with different desktops to see which you like. For reliability and ease of use, look at
Fuduntu
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...page/15/sort/7
Mint (Mate version)
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...p/product/2397
SalineOS
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...page/15/sort/7
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-15-2013, 01:48 AM   #11
bloody
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Berlin
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 172

Rep: Reputation: 25
Xubuntu is NOT light. It's almost as bloated as Ubuntu but with Xfce instead, and it's not the fastest system either, except for the great boot speed. Yes, it's bloated. 1200 packages standard installation (after adding a bunch of packages).
 
Old 03-15-2013, 06:05 AM   #12
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
@ bloody

Touché, but...try to install Arch nowadays...the choice is simple: have an installer make some preliminary choices and have a bit more on the system than needed, or hand-pick the packages, or in other words: simple or tough...
Okay, I prefer Arch (and the likes) any day, but I needed a system that works, Linux is all I use, and at the time Xubuntu (with flaws) was the better one...
But, yes, you're right, there's quite a bit that "flushes" in...

Last edited by ButterflyMelissa; 03-15-2013 at 06:08 AM.
 
Old 03-26-2013, 07:16 AM   #13
goumba
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Distribution: Fedora, OpenSUSE, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, macOS (hack). Past: Debian, Arch, RedHat (pre-RHEL).
Posts: 1,335
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 402Reputation: 402Reputation: 402Reputation: 402Reputation: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloody View Post
Xubuntu is NOT light. It's almost as bloated as Ubuntu but with Xfce instead, and it's not the fastest system either, except for the great boot speed. Yes, it's bloated. 1200 packages standard installation (after adding a bunch of packages).
Forgetting the bloat, it was slow on my iBook G4 1.0GHz and likely on the OPs system too. Debian is a bit snappier with the same DE. FWIW, Debian with XFCE is noticeably faster than Lubuntu as well.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
choosing linux distribution cherry1987 Linux - Newbie 6 06-20-2011 12:48 PM
New To Linux: Help Choosing Distribution Tamadrummer Linux - General 17 03-11-2008 11:47 PM
LXer: Choosing the Right Linux Distribution LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-07-2007 06:16 AM
Newbie of Linux: need help on choosing and downloading distribution buixuanduong1983 Linux - Distributions 6 03-06-2007 08:58 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration