Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When I installed Linux, I chose to use 30Gb for / and 30Gb for /home.
Unfortunately, this has proven to be a mistake. My /home partition is seriously full and / is only about 5%.
Is there any way to resize these partitions without reinstalling completely or screwing up the whole system - which would lead to a reinstallation anyway?
Can this be done please?
I use PCLinuxOS 2007 on an Asus A6Km laptop, with an 80Gb hard disk.
If you formatted your partition using ReiserFS, you theoretically could ("resize_reiserfs" command), but I never tried it out. Don't know about other filesystems.
I am interested in this sort of question as well. I have a 12 GB /, formatted as jfs, and find that I need more space.
On the other hand, if i could just expand the existing partition, I have space available. I was wondering if I could resize the partition using parted and then do a remount,resize to expand the jfs file system, but I do not know whether data corruption would result or if I'd have to mount / using a livecd to do the resize, or whether I could do it logged in as root in a multiuser environment.
theapodan, by the way I have jfs too on my notebook - I decided to use that one after a small test showed that the CPU usage was the smallest one when dealing with files on a JFS partition compared to others (XFS, Reiser, ext, etc...).
But when I had to decide what kind of filesystem to use for another PC, I did a small test and saw that actually ReiserFS is quite good especially at dealing with small files (e.g. source code), so I went for it and I am still happy with it. Now that I know this I would reformat my notebook using ReiserFS. On the other side I really don't like Ext2 & 3. Have a look here at point 2b.
Why did you choose JFS?
I used jfs because I saw some synthetic benchmarks that showed it with the best performance/cpu utilization ratio. I have seen evidence to the contrary, but it seems to work fine, so I haven't worried about it. File I/O is not a real big deal for me.
I also think IBM makes good stuff. We used an AIX cluster in college and it was always reliable and fast, so I figured I'd use jfs for historical reasons too.
And also, EVERYONE uses reiserfs or ext3. I have to be different.
if you don't have any file on your home so i guess you just should format your hdd and re-partitionate like this: 6GB for "/" and the rest to "/home". But how much memory do you have? you need to make a swap partition with at least 512 MB if you have less than 1 GB RAM. On my computer i got 1 GB of DDR2 and a swap partition of 2GB (it's unnecessary so much but as i got plenty of space on my HDD it's not a waste).
hehe, yeah theapodan, your last reason was as well something I thought about. But unluckily in my case the result wasn't great. Especially when I want to install some new program (I use Gentoo with "portage" as package manager which currently has 35000 tiny files in its file-database), checking for dependencies on JFS takes 20 times longer (a few minutes) than on ReiserFS, if it's the first check and the data is not yet cached in RAM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.