[SOLVED] *box WM's still lightweight wm of choice?
Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Just got around to upgrading the fleet (5 years late) and was content enough with my setups that I haven't kept up with changes over the years. When I'm using virtualbox I prefer the most minimal X environment possible, so I can allocate more resources to the guest. Are the *box wm's still king of the hill in this regard?
Yeah, I'm a fluxbox user myself. I like the configuration options being very open and editable too. I was just wondering if any new lightweight wm's have proven their worth over the past 5 or so years of my inattention, if so I'm in a try-it-out type of mood during setup. Currently using LXde on Debian 10, and I've used IceWM and Xfce but they're a little heavier than needed for the application (though not by much). The desktop in mind for this is just for running FreeCAD, Blender, and virtualbox to run Matlab, Mathcad, and SolidEdge in Windows(tm) if needed. Basically I need just enough "X" to open gui windows.
Last edited by Ragnarok Warrior; 10-21-2019 at 08:14 PM.
The only new,significant lightweight WM released during that time period that I can think of is LXQt which is basically a rewrite of LXDE from Gtk to Qt:
The only new,significant lightweight WM released during that time period that I can think of is LXQt which is basically a rewrite of LXDE from Gtk to Qt:
Openbox and Fluxbox are my lightweight WMs of choice, but I don't think there are any kings of the hill. I was just taking a look at antiX-19, which ships with multiple WMs but has IceWM as the default. Of course, lots of other users prefer a tiling WM. From what I've seen, not much has really changed over the past several years with the WMs out there.
I've used the GKrellM system monitor for years (I like its compact footprint). I use it, and it has a built-in battery monitor.
And you can set up the battery monitor to spam you with xmessage(1) when the battery level falls below a specific percentage. That has saved me many times when I forget to check the monitor in gkrellm
I always use fluxbox except on my laptop, where I like IceWM because it has a builtin battery monitor.
I've been using the tint2 panel with Fluxbox, instead of the Fluxbox toolbar. tint2 has a built-in battery option that shows the battery charging status.
You know, it just occurred to me that one could write a simple battery monitor using gtk. Basically it would be a small docked window containing a vertical progress bar. The program would run in a loop, reading the current charge from /sys/class/battery, turning it into a percentage of the original charge, and then updating the progress bar with that percentage. It could bleep in warning when a certain level was reached.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.