What do you consider Apple to be in relation to Linux?
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Is Apple a friend or foe to open-source/Linux?
I doubt that Apple will use Linux for the base of their OS in the near future because part, but not all, of their user base likes/needs simplicity in their computing environment, and currently Linux is a little too unpolished for that.
if you ever worked with Assembly (even something simple like displaying a text message, or drawing to the graphical screen (doesn't matter how much, a single pixel for all i care)) then you'd know how "unpolished" it is, compared to the system the kernel is very simple, and the user would never even need to work with the kernel, so that cant be it
there all different to me, this isnt a question of friend, foe etc. Apple and Microsoft are in it for business purposes first IMO. M$ just played harder, and went out to crush the competition like alot of business do. Gates wanted to dominate the market and he did and for that reason we all cant stand him...LOL! But remember he was once a nerd to but eventually bought into the darkside like Darth Vader
apple suck and steve jobbs is the root of all evil, all the apple hardware and software is based on other peoples work such as the g5(ibm) osx(freebsd) and office, apple is a clone in disguise
Originally posted by pepsi apple suck and steve jobbs is the root of all evil, all the apple hardware and software is based on other peoples work such as the g5(ibm) osx(freebsd) and office, apple is a clone in disguise
Are you trying to start a flame? What you posted here isn't exactly accurate or fair, and in the light of what M$ has always been, a bit ridiculous
That's agreed. I'm trying to be as bipartisan as possible, but so far in computer history, Apple has been the innovator. Apple created the world's first desktop GUI, and that's only one. How can you call Steve Jobs the root of all evil? Do you know the man that well?
I thought so!
(And to think, all this coming from a non-Mac owner/user (except for an old System 7.5 Performa))
Totally agree with apache363, Mac was the first to have a GUI while the rest of us, either msdos or linux users only had command line console, and Mac is awesome at graphic design, nice pipeline design, nice code execution regardless of the environment conditions, nice user-friendly system response
So calling Steve Jobs 'the root of all evil' and saying Apple sucks seems a bit 'inmature' for me, at least for me (no flaming intended)
Julio
P.D. BTW, I said Apple must consider Linux as an alternative, just in case their sales fall at a critical rate... the big problem with Apple has been always the same... they want to be the only one in the market... and currently they're the only one in... their market segment
Originally posted by pepsi apple suck and steve jobbs is the root of all evil, all the apple hardware and software is based on other peoples work such as the g5(ibm) osx(freebsd) and office, apple is a clone in disguise
Lets tone it down some please. These are the types of comments that start flame wars and thread closures. Also this has nothing to do directly with the thread topic, so move on if you have nothing else constructive to say.
And for the record:
And everyone basically stole the GUI from Xerox.. in which Apple got first and then M$ took from them.. and so on.. etc.
And IBM has contracts with many companies, as they have the resources and technology that some don't have. Its called partnerships, how you run businesses and cut costs, etc.
IBM designs chips for PS2/Sony and many other companies, so if you going to start negative comments about one company, with false statements, you'll need to do a lot of research to talk trash about every company that does the same thing.
The list goes on and on... so lets move on with the actual topic or your going to ruin this thread for everyone and prompt a mod to have it closed.
That's how I see it too. Linux is like the OS X for x86/Athlon and it's making real strides today -- I just read that the governments of Korea Japan and China are working their own distro!
Apple is evil because they did what we BSD users encourage? BSD is about sharing innovations and coding for the good of all. Anyone can take our source and use it for whatever use they want, no strings attached. In my opinion this makes the BSD license vastly superior to GPL since i dont believe that proprietary software is the devil and does not have a place in this world. Call me crazy but i dont see eye to eye with the Stallman cult.
Secondly Apple runs on IBM chips(PowerPC) which uses a MIPS architecture. You will find this architecture in your Playstation, most VCR and in many embedded systems.
Thirdly Apple will never use the Linux kernel. A kernel transplant is not the simple thing some of the above posters have foolishly suggested. Being a programmer i cant even begin to try to tell you how long this would take.
Lastly Apple is not in competition with Linux. Do you want to know why? Because Apple makes user friendly operating system that your Grandmother can use and install onto her mac if she had to. Think of it being as user friendly as Microsoft(it is). Pop in the cd and it will autoload and kick you into a splashy install screen etc... Apple has Internet Explorer, Microsoft Office, Photoshop and PowerPoint. Apple is perfect for a user friendly desktop. You dont need to recompile your kernel, install from source compile in drivers for that new card etc... Apple is fool proof and built for the computer illiterate but still gives you the power of a console with a BSD underpinning.
PS: The statistics about the market share of Apple vs Linux are misleading at best since Apple aims for the desktop market and graphics artists. Linux's 4% is mostly made up in the server market. Seeing as google on there own run 100,000 racks running linux, is that a fair comparison?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.