GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If you actually read the patent, it seems to be patenting a "preview" of the virtual desktops, not the concept of virtual desktops themselves. That seems to be the reason that they are including the Gnome and KDE screen shots; they are claiming that the current method of previewing other desktops is lacking.
I hope mdg doesn't mind the additional bandwidth, but if you look at this screenshot of Enlightenment, the pager seems to be everything this thing MS is attempting to patent is, and maybe more considering it spans 2 screens.
It's stuff like this that really makes me hate capitalism.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
virtual desktop, microsoft, patent?
