think about this CISPA invalidates ALL privacy policies
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's too early to say whether CISPA is ready to be "opposed," or even if it will survive. But there is a dearth of definitive legislation about proper handling of personal information apart from a few American laws like HIPAA, and about exactly how and what information can be shared among companies or between companies and the government. Right now, no one knows for sure.
You can go to the Library of Congress web-site and look up the actual draft legislation and the various commentaries concerning it, which are prepared for legislator use. I generally suggest that you should do that, instead of reading merely about how much bribe-money is being spent "for" or "against" it.
You should never have "an expectation of privacy" with regard to the Internet ... and you should also be mindful that a sword cuts both ways. Some of CISPA's (proposed) provisions are actually meant to increase privacy by setting forth regulations concerning "geo-location" features and other things that right now are sending information without your knowledge or consent.
It's too early to say whether CISPA is ready to be "opposed," or even if it will survive. But there is a dearth of definitive legislation about proper handling of personal information apart from a few American laws like HIPAA, and about exactly how and what information can be shared among companies or between companies and the government. Right now, no one knows for sure.
You can go to the Library of Congress web-site and look up the actual draft legislation and the various commentaries concerning it, which are prepared for legislator use. I generally suggest that you should do that, instead of reading merely about how much bribe-money is being spent "for" or "against" it.
You should never have "an expectation of privacy" with regard to the Internet ... and you should also be mindful that a sword cuts both ways. Some of CISPA's (proposed) provisions are actually meant to increase privacy by setting forth regulations concerning "geo-location" features and other things that right now are sending information without your knowledge or consent.
Actually I've read the bill in full. Its a completely unnecessary bill that's basically warrant-less wiretapping which is against the constitution. It also has a whole lot of sketchy provisions that are good for corporations and bad for people.
Mike Rogers, the Senator in charge of the NSA and the CIA writes a bill about "sharing" information from citizen's personal computers with corporations and the NSA, something there's never a justification for, and you aren't terribly alarmed?
Just the fact that the bill invalidates all privacy policies is enough that it should be thrown away completely. Its not about bribe money spent for or against it, its a bad bill. I mean I could go on and on about this, but there's no sword that cuts both ways here. Companies have already shown that they're not that great at protecting customer's personal information. A bill, justified by "cyber terrorism", whatever that is, that makes companies immune to prosecution for whatever information they share with the government or other companies? That's totally insane.
Please, I could write more about this but... the bottom line is that the government doesn't need more power to abuse and mismanage. And a free pass to share personal information is a BAD idea.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.