Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!


  Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2019, 07:32 AM   #1
Registered: Mar 2009
Distribution: Slackware, Linux From Scratch, Bedrock
Posts: 357
Blog Entries: 50

Rep: Reputation: 34
Question on the BSD 2-clause license

Apologies in advance, because I could not with certainty determine which section this should be posted in.

A question has emerged on the BSD 2-clause license. The last paragraph of that license is
The views and conclusions contained in the software and documentation are 
those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing official 
policies, either expressed or implied, of the <project name> project.
What if the program being licensed is not part of a "project?" What if it's just: Bob wrote a program here it is enjoy and have a nice day? I assume removing the paragraph would make it no longer the BSD 2-clause license. So when there is no project, how does one word it? Or must one go to a different license?

Thank you.

Last edited by jr_bob_dobbs; 06-26-2019 at 07:35 AM.
Old 06-26-2019, 07:37 AM   #2
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSUSE
Posts: 968

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Just guessing because I have never had to deal with this: the project name would be the program Bob wrote. The license would pertain to that application. All applications are "projects" whether 1 person wrote it or 100 people wrote it.

My .02.
Old 06-26-2019, 05:00 PM   #3
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 3,474

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
You could do like NetBSD:
Other projects, such as NetBSD, use a similar 2-clause license, but without the additional disclaimer.
Old 06-26-2019, 05:49 PM   #4
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,272
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490Reputation: 1490
Perhaps consider the ISC licence:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which is best licensed ftp server : Pureftp(Bsd license) vs vsftpd (Gpl license) jsaravana87 Linux - Server 1 10-03-2012 11:22 AM
GPL license, BSD license and... ? kikinovak Slackware 3 09-10-2012 12:53 PM
PC BSD, Open BSD, or Free BSD ? Alexvader *BSD 5 02-08-2010 12:40 AM
LXer: The Unlicense: A License for No License LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-12-2010 03:32 AM
Question: How to define an SQL HAVING clause in relational algebra? jdruin Linux - Software 1 11-08-2004 07:50 AM > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration