GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Newegg has announced today, somewhat gleefully, that when faced with actually having to go to trial, Macrosolve has "folded like a cheap suit" dismissing its lawsuit against Newegg (and Geico, the one other company who fought back).
I think the abolition of any and all intellectual property laws is unwise. We need incentives to promote progress. We just need them to pass into Public Domain in a reasonable time as was originally mandated in Patent Law.
I don't think anyone has argued that all intellectual properly laws should be abolished.
Software patents are merely one form of IP. Code can be copyrighted. Physical things can be patented.
What's truly underhanded about many of these software patents suits is that persons were allowed to patent ideas and defend those patents, even if a working implementation, let alone production model, is never produced.
Implemented code is well protected by copyright. If software patents are such a good idea, how come they're largely confined to the USA and Japan? Eurp(e (despite pressure from US companies) and the BRICS nations get on fine without them.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.