LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-12-2005, 06:48 PM   #31
carl0ski
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria Australia
Distribution: Support those that support you :)
Posts: 872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 30

Quote:
Originally posted by nuka_t
what are you people smoking?

they wont cut software compatibility. that would be just stupid. current progs will probably get support cut off at blackcomb, which is supposed to be released 5 years from now and then add 2-3 more years of delays.
Considering the massive delays your probably right but

MS promised us Longhorn will be revolutionary and completely new.
They promised to remove dated software support for VB pre .NET, and capatibilty mechanism (95 2000 98 ME 3.1).

but considering they started with windows XP os and added stuff. to produce Longhorn betas.

Longhorn isnt as revolutionary as they promised.
they promised a bump equivilant as 3.1 - 95
and 9x to windows 2000.

Support for other older software in Windows is the job of API's and MS promised to remove them to speed up the core, and a number of security flaws were contributed by compatibility layer API for old software. as of late no Software i ran on XP was unstable bah software written in pre .NET, and backward capatible 9x software.

It's in our best interest for MS to remove the support for pre 2000 software and VB pre dot.NET

It would make a faster lesss bloated kernel and less instability

Last edited by carl0ski; 02-12-2005 at 06:53 PM.
 
Old 02-12-2005, 10:58 PM   #32
nuka_t
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Distribution: YOPER+KDE
Posts: 263

Rep: Reputation: 30
all apps that work in xp will work in longhorn. longhorn will use the exact same compatibilty scheme as xp does.


in blackcomb(all rumour of course) they will remove the registry and go with managed code only. they will start this transition with longhorn by using managed code in "native" longhorn apps. however, it will be just as capable as xp in running xp apps.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vista Longhorn what do you think??? cormack General 29 02-16-2007 01:45 PM
Longhorn Cancelled mickeyboa General 38 07-28-2005 07:16 AM
LongHorn Screenshots Dirty_Ink General 147 03-13-2005 04:50 PM
New Windows Longhorn kaloyer General 31 07-05-2004 10:27 AM
Longhorn bkeating General 20 10-26-2003 05:19 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration